2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 16th International Conference On 2018
DOI: 10.1109/hpcc/smartcity/dss.2018.00239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Ground Truth Data for Automatic Lumbar Spine MRI Image Segmentation

Abstract: Artificial Intelligence through supervised machine learning remains an attractive and popular research area in medical image processing. The objective of such research is often tied to the development of an intelligent computer aided diagnostic system whose aim is to assist physicians in their task of diagnosing diseases. The quality of the resulting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are consistent with the previous experiment we reported in [21]. The IVD has the highest confidence and consistency values compared to the other three.…”
Section: Ground Truth Data Quality Metricssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are consistent with the previous experiment we reported in [21]. The IVD has the highest confidence and consistency values compared to the other three.…”
Section: Ground Truth Data Quality Metricssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…On average, five to ten minutes are spent to label each of the 1,545 slices. We employ the strategy we have designed previously in [21] to develop our ground truth dataset using five participant/labelers. We analyze the quality of the developed ground-truth dataset using the confidence and consistency metrics that we presented in that paper.…”
Section: B Image Labels and Ground-truth Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work using the dataset [3], the root canal space is called AAP (called the canal/space), which represents the area between the anterior and posterior. The width of the AAP depends on where in the spine the measurement is taken.…”
Section: Figure 1 Spinal Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also reflected in the popularity of image analysis methods in the literature that use sagittal MRI images to detect LSS [6,[13][14][15][16]. However, a more accurate assessment of the actual location and the extent of the LSS can only be obtained through inspection of the suspected IVD in traverse view (as illustrated in Fig 3) [17,18]. Traverse images taken from planes that cut closest to the half-height of the L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1 IVDs are generally considered as the best images to use when the neuroradiologist inspects the disc because The task of selecting these traverse images falls into the category of image classification and can be solved using machine learning (ML).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%