2019
DOI: 10.3926/jotse.527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Grade 10 Students’ Scientific Argumentation through the Science-Technology-Society Learning Unit on Work and Energy

Abstract: This study aims to examine the effect of Science-Technology-Society (STS) learning unit on the Work and Energy topic in developing grade 10 students’ scientific argumentation. The research participants were 20 grade 10 students at one secondary school located in Khon Kaen province, the Northeastern region of Thailand. The students’ tasks, discourse and informal interview were collected and interpreted according to the Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) framework. The findings revealed that the STS learning unit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They should have developed the ability to evaluate arguments, determine whether their claims are based on evidence or whether the reasonings included are adequately justified. Furthermore, engaging in argument may help the students better understand science content (Pimvichai, Yuenyong & Buaraphan, 2019;Sandoval & Reiser, 2004).…”
Section: Science and Engineering Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They should have developed the ability to evaluate arguments, determine whether their claims are based on evidence or whether the reasonings included are adequately justified. Furthermore, engaging in argument may help the students better understand science content (Pimvichai, Yuenyong & Buaraphan, 2019;Sandoval & Reiser, 2004).…”
Section: Science and Engineering Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of the inquiry as an object of active learning is strongly recommended in many of the current strategies for the teaching of science, since it gives students the opportunity to participate in a real investigation, and, so practice the procedural skills of science, in addition to developing critical thinking and the ability to solve problems (Martínez-Chico, Jiménez-Liso & López-Gay, 2014; Pimvichai, Yuenyong & Buaraphan, 2019;Rosa, 2019;Rusmansyah, Yuanita, Ibrahim, Isnawati & Prahani, 2019). Bevins and Price (2016) suggest that inquiry is the best method for teaching science; promoting research skills in students and helping them internalise new knowledge in the search for answers to scientific questions.…”
Section: Inquiry-based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sınıf öğretmenlerinin FTT yaklaşımı çerçevesinde fen bilgisi öğrenim ortamı tasarlama bilgisinin yeterli seviyede olmasının nedeni olarak geliştirilen kursun öğretmenlere hem fen ve teknolojinin doğası ve bunların toplum ve çevre ile olan ilişkisini doğru kavratması ve yapısalcı öğretim yöntem ve teknikleri hakkında bilgi ve beceri ile donatılması gösterilebilir (Mansour, 2010;Amirshokoohi, 2016). Diğer taraftan alan yazında da öğretmenlerin FTT yaklaşımına dayalı bir eğitim sürecini girmesinin, yaklaşımla ilgili teorik anlayışlarını oluşturmalarına, uygun öğretim yöntemlerini seçmelerine ve başarılı bir şeklide sınıfta uygulamalarına önemli bir katkı sağladığını vurgulayan çalışmalar bulunmaktadır (Mansour, 2010;Pimvichai, Yuenyong & Buaraphan, 2019).…”
Section: İkinci Alt Probleme Yönelik Elde Edilen Bulguların Tartışılmasıunclassified
“…Problemi tanımlamada ve çözmede kendi bilgilerini kullanma, ✓ Yaratıcılıklarını geliştirme, ✓ Bilgi ve delillere dayalı harekete geçme, ✓ Etkili bir şekilde fen ile iletişim kurma, ✓ Fen ve teknolojiye karşı pozitif tutum, ✓ Nasıl öğrendiğini bilme gibi davranışları da kazanır (Firmino vd., 2019, Nuutinen, Kärkkäinen v& Keinonen, 2011Primastuti & Atun 2018;Pimvichai, Yuenyong & Buaraphan, 2019;Wongsila & Yuenyong, 2019).…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation