2009
DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Genomic Reference Materials for Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples were chosen from cell lines that had been validated as part of the GeT-RM program 8 or sent to participating CAP/ACMG committee member laboratories to verify the mutations before distribution. Results of the MGL2 and MGL5 surveys were evaluated together and, after 2008, separately.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were chosen from cell lines that had been validated as part of the GeT-RM program 8 or sent to participating CAP/ACMG committee member laboratories to verify the mutations before distribution. Results of the MGL2 and MGL5 surveys were evaluated together and, after 2008, separately.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible strategy to facilitate the process is to build consortiums to gather and develop reference materials for public use, as has been initiated for CFTR. 47 Moreover, deposition of the novel variants into a "reference library" should be encouraged. Then, a new method can be evaluated with all the deposited variants available at the time of test development, making cross-comparison of the sensitivity between methods and platforms more readily available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For clinical laboratories performing molecular diagnostics, participation in proficiency testing/quality assessment programs (PT/EQA) is essential [4][5][6][7]. Disease-specific or methodological PT/EQA protocols are now available in genetic testing [8][9][10][11] and microbiology [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%