2008
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzm047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of fructosyl amine oxidase specific to fructosyl valine by site-directed mutagenesis

Abstract: Docking models of fructosyl amine oxidase (FAOD) from the marine yeast Pichia N1-1 (N1-1 FAOD) with the substrates fructosyl valine (f-Val) and fructosyl-(epsilon)N-lysine (f-(epsilon)Lys) were produced using three-dimensional protein model as reported previously (Miura et al., 2006, Biotechnol. Lett., 28, 1895-1900). The residues involved in recognition of substrates were proposed, particularly Asn354, which interacts closely with f-(epsilon)Lys, but not with f-Val. Substitution of Asn354 to histidine and lys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we observe that both f-lys and f-val are highly unstable in the N1-1-FAOD enzyme, as suggested by the low population of the major conformational cluster (46 % for f-lys and 18 % for f-val) and by the high mobility of the substrates in the binding pocket, also involving the otherwise usually stable sugar moiety. This result is in accordance with the experimental findings [4,6], which show that N1-1-FAOD has the worst K m and V max when compared with all the FAOX considered in this study (see also Table 3). …”
Section: Enzyme Structures and Sequence Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we observe that both f-lys and f-val are highly unstable in the N1-1-FAOD enzyme, as suggested by the low population of the major conformational cluster (46 % for f-lys and 18 % for f-val) and by the high mobility of the substrates in the binding pocket, also involving the otherwise usually stable sugar moiety. This result is in accordance with the experimental findings [4,6], which show that N1-1-FAOD has the worst K m and V max when compared with all the FAOX considered in this study (see also Table 3). …”
Section: Enzyme Structures and Sequence Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Structure-based sequence alignment of the five selected FAOD enzymes. Amadoriase I and Amadoriase II sequences from Aspergillus Fumigatus [30][31][32], PnFPOX from Phaeospheria nodorum [33], and N1-1-FAOD from Pichia species N11 [4,7] were aligned using ClustalW 1.82 [34][35][36] and colored using ESPript 3.0 [37]. White in a red box shows strict identity, while red in a white box indicate similarity.…”
Section: Enzyme Structures and Sequence Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many groups have reported efforts, with the help of computerized models, to improve substrate selectivity of FAOX enzymes for fructosylvaline to develop enzymatic assays utilizing proteolytic digests of glycated hemoglobin (38). The FAOX-II structure will aid in this endeavor.…”
Section: Crystal Structure Of the Deglycating Enzyme Faox-iimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By creating a structural model and carrying out docking studies, we identified the amino acid residue Asn354 as interacting with the potential substrates. 33,34 Substitution of Asn354 to histidine or lysine simultaneously increased the enzyme's activity towards f-A Val and decreased that towards f-X Lys, thus greatly improving its specificity for f-A Val. Similarly, substitution of the His51 residue also produced mutants with significantly improved specificity for f-A Val.…”
Section: Improving Substrate Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%