2012
DOI: 10.2350/11-07-1057-oa.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Fetal Intestinal Length during 2nd-Trimester in Normal and Pathologic Pregnancies

Abstract: Linear growth of the human fetal gastrointestinal tract is not often discussed in the literature, and little is known about the effects of chromosomal abnormalities and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) on intestinal length, especially during the 2nd trimester. Accurate evaluation of intestinal length and knowledge of normal and reference values are of clinical importance. For example, intestinal resection may be necessary in preterm infants with necrotizing enterocolitis or mid-gut volvulus, and the surg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 27 Whether IUGR impacts fetal intestinal length remains equivocal, 3 4 and in our analysis IUGR did not have any impact on intestinal length. Similar to prior literature, 4 maceration did not appear to have an impact on the growth of small intestinal lengths, and is in keeping with prior literature demonstrating that maceration does not alter all body measurements. 15 The presence of congenital anomalies did not alter the small intestinal length.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…26 27 Whether IUGR impacts fetal intestinal length remains equivocal, 3 4 and in our analysis IUGR did not have any impact on intestinal length. Similar to prior literature, 4 maceration did not appear to have an impact on the growth of small intestinal lengths, and is in keeping with prior literature demonstrating that maceration does not alter all body measurements. 15 The presence of congenital anomalies did not alter the small intestinal length.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In keeping with other studies, no differences in intestine length were found between sexes, and hence we combined data for males and females to maximize the sample size. 4 22 23 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations