2017
DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Evaluation Indicators for Hospice and Palliative Care Professionals Training Programs in Korea

Abstract: The evaluation indicators of the modified model will be valuable references for improving the HPC professional training program.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methodologies have been developed and used for evaluation of training programs, but which were not adapted to the PASODOBLEDEMI study. For instance, the Context-Inputs-Process-Product model (or the Stufflebeam model) [ 31 , 32 ] is based on the comparison of pre- and posttraining program evaluation to assess the gain in knowledge and confidence of participants; the Levels of Learning model (or the Kaufman model) is based on the use of specific evaluation scales (Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement) as an individually administered battery that provides in-depth assessment and evaluation of skills [ 33 ], but the design of this model is too rigid for the objectives of this study; and the Success Case Method (or the Brinkerhoff model) that is closer to an economically oriented performance scale with a study design based on a survey and semistructured interviews [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methodologies have been developed and used for evaluation of training programs, but which were not adapted to the PASODOBLEDEMI study. For instance, the Context-Inputs-Process-Product model (or the Stufflebeam model) [ 31 , 32 ] is based on the comparison of pre- and posttraining program evaluation to assess the gain in knowledge and confidence of participants; the Levels of Learning model (or the Kaufman model) is based on the use of specific evaluation scales (Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement) as an individually administered battery that provides in-depth assessment and evaluation of skills [ 33 ], but the design of this model is too rigid for the objectives of this study; and the Success Case Method (or the Brinkerhoff model) that is closer to an economically oriented performance scale with a study design based on a survey and semistructured interviews [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of the education and training process has become a common practice in many fields of professional activities, and complex methods are used to do that. The CIPP method (contextinputprocessproduct) is pointed out as being universally acceptable for assessing the quality in the terms of construct validity of education programmes in many different fields, adjusting it to the area specifics [12]. In this case, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis may be used to identify the desirable training subjects.…”
Section: Background and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%