2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of engineering design tools to help reduce apple bruising

Abstract: A large percentage of apples are wasted each year due to damage such as bruising. The apple journey from orchard to supermarket is very complex and apples are subjected to a variety of static and dynamic loads that could result in this damage occurring.The main aim of this work was to carry out numerical modelling to develop a design tool that can be used to optimise the design of harvesting and sorting equipment and packaging media to reduce the likelihood of apple bruise formation resulting from impact loads… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the transfer(s) from orchard to retailer, the potential drop heights of between 0.05 m and 1.2 m have previously been researched in the scientific literature related with drop tests of apples (Stropek and Golacki, 2007;Moaveni, 1991;Menesatti and Paglia, 2001;Holmes et al, 1998). Potential dynamic apple loading situations and associated drop heights are given in Table 2 (Lewis et al, 2007). Hence, a suitable assumption was created by considering potential drop heights from the scientific literature for the drop height in this finite element analysis (FEA).…”
Section: Drop Case Scenario Of the Applementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the transfer(s) from orchard to retailer, the potential drop heights of between 0.05 m and 1.2 m have previously been researched in the scientific literature related with drop tests of apples (Stropek and Golacki, 2007;Moaveni, 1991;Menesatti and Paglia, 2001;Holmes et al, 1998). Potential dynamic apple loading situations and associated drop heights are given in Table 2 (Lewis et al, 2007). Hence, a suitable assumption was created by considering potential drop heights from the scientific literature for the drop height in this finite element analysis (FEA).…”
Section: Drop Case Scenario Of the Applementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruise was measured as the procedure introduced by Lewis et al (2007). Apples were left for 24 h after dropping, for full development of bruises.…”
Section: Bruise Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bruise prediction models may be applied by either impact energy (Studman et al, 1997;Lewis et al, 2007;Jarimopas et al, 2007) or peak contact force (Chen and Yazdani, 1991;Bajema and Hyde, 1998;Van Zeebroeck et al, 2007a;Lewis et al, 2008). The bruise prediction model including the impact energy demands a lot of experimental work.…”
Section: Average Pressure Pressured Area and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The apples were inspected 24 hours after the completion of testing because prior work suggests that any bruise that was going to form from damage would be fully visible within 24 hours. 23 During pretest-inspection, any bruising that was found was recorded, but apples with virtually no bruising were moved into the dummy apple locations as seen in Figure 1. Each case sampled was packed with new trays and pre-inspected apples.…”
Section: Preparation and Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%