2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-013-0988-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of elite rice restorer lines in the genetic background of R022 possessing tolerance to brown planthopper, stem borer, leaf folder and herbicide through marker-assisted breeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Naidoo et al (2012) observed that when transferring lpa1-1 to a maize inbred line, the restoration rate of the genetic background in BC 2 F 1 plants reached 84% using marker-assisted screening of the genomic background. Similar findings were reported for rice regarding resistance to Pyricularia oryzae (84% in BC 3 ; Gouda et al, 2013), tolerance to planthoppers, stem borers, leaf folders, and herbicides (95.8% in BC 3 F 4 ; Wan et al, 2014), and the breeding of pepper varieties rich in capsaicin ester (96% in BC 2 F 1 ; Jeong et al, 2015). In the current study, before the background analyses in background populations, genetic background of 01-20 and D134 were determined.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Naidoo et al (2012) observed that when transferring lpa1-1 to a maize inbred line, the restoration rate of the genetic background in BC 2 F 1 plants reached 84% using marker-assisted screening of the genomic background. Similar findings were reported for rice regarding resistance to Pyricularia oryzae (84% in BC 3 ; Gouda et al, 2013), tolerance to planthoppers, stem borers, leaf folders, and herbicides (95.8% in BC 3 F 4 ; Wan et al, 2014), and the breeding of pepper varieties rich in capsaicin ester (96% in BC 2 F 1 ; Jeong et al, 2015). In the current study, before the background analyses in background populations, genetic background of 01-20 and D134 were determined.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The understanding of the molecular basis of resistance to BPH was greatly advanced with the cloning and characterization of several BPH resistance genes. Among these, a broad spectrum BPH32 gene originally derived from PTB33 and RH has been extensively studied and introgressed into numerous commercial rice varieties with desirable backgrounds [6] [8]. New rice varieties with BPH resistance have been developed and introduced to farmers [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromosomal location of BPH3 from RH and PTB33 has been reported on the short arm of chromosome 6 [4]. The BPH resistance locus has been widely used in BPH resistance breeding via marker-assisted selection (MAS) [5] [6] [7] [8]. Recently, the BPH3 gene was identified and renamed as BPH32 [9] to avoid confusion with the cloned BPH3 cluster genes located on the short arm of chromosome 4 [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of Bt toxins is a common method for the biological control of pests, these compounds are ineffective against Hemipteran pests. Pyramiding multiple genes, such as BPH14, BPH15, and Cry1C in elite restorer lines enhanced resistance to BPH, SSB, and RLF (Wan et al 2014). A fusion protein consisting of the DI and DII domains of Bt Cry1Ac and the carbohydrate-binding domain of garlic lectin showed remarkable toxicity against Lepidopteran and Hemipteran insects (Boddupally et al 2018).…”
Section: Bt and Lectins Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%