Development of Digital Preservation Environments by the UK Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)

Beagrie, Neil; Carpenter, Lindsay Inge

doi:10.1109/lgdi.2005.1612469

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Small publishers are not the cheap to work with. A JISC report (Beagrie et al , 2008) says:The profile of costs across functions within the national data centres we interviewed appears to be very consistent. It was notable that they all believed their accessioning and ingest costs were higher than ongoing long‐term preservation and archiving costs.…”

Section: Question 2: Small Publishersmentioning

confidence: 88%

Archiving in the networked world: by the numbers

Seadle

2011

Library Hi Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Type: research article Purpose: The purpose is to investigate: 1) how many journal titles are both in LOCKSS and in Portico? 2) what is the relationship of small publishers to LOCKSS/CLOCKSS and Portico? 2) what is the relationship of large publishers to LOCKSS/CLOCKSS and Portico? Methodology: The article describes how data from Portico, LOCKSS, and CLOCKSS was cleaned and analyzed using Perl programs to discover duplications. Findings: The findings show a significant overlap among the archiving systems. It also shows that Portico has no bias against small publishers and that large publisher are as willing to choose the LOCKSS software as to choose Portico. LOCKSS does, however, archive many more small and arguably endangered publishers and may be the only economically viable choice for them. Originality/value: The push for greater transparency has made more and more data available. Both LOCKSS and Portico deserve commendation for providing the detailed lists of titles and publishers on which this article was based. Such data gives the library community an opportunity to build decisions about the long term digital future on firm and verifiable ground.

show abstract

Section: Question 2: Small Publishersmentioning

confidence: 88%

Archiving in the networked world: by the numbers

Seadle

2011

Library Hi Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While clearly critical to the success of any infrastructure, such information is not captured by the kind of metrics commonly associated with user surveys. For instance, the user study of the Archaeology Data Service (ADS) (Beagrie & Houghton 2013) is couched in terms of economic value and efficiency. This is clearly important for demonstrating the significance and sustainability of the infrastructure.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Unravelling Archaeological Digital Infrastructures

Huggett

2024

csa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Development of Digital Preservation Environments by the UK Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Archiving in the networked world: by the numbers

Archiving in the networked world: by the numbers

Unravelling Archaeological Digital Infrastructures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About