Development of diabetes-specific quality of life module to be in conjunction with the World Health Organization quality of life scale brief version (WHOQOL-BREF)

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough numerous health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments are available for patients with diabetes, the length of these measures may limit their feasibility to routine practice. Also, these measures do not distinguish items for generic and diabetes-specific HRQoL. This study was aimed to develop a diabetes-specific quality of life questionnaire module (DMQoL) to be in conjunction with the World Health Organization Quality of Life scale brief version (WHOQOL-BREF).MethodsOne hundred seventeen patients with diabetes were enrolled from a medical center in Taiwan. The item content of DMQoL was constructed based on an extensive review of existing HRQoL instruments for diabetes, expert discussions and patient interviews. A series of psychometric tests were conducted to ensure the reliability and validity of DMQoL. The WHOQOL-BREF served as an existing HRQoL measure for construct validity testing. The response scale of DMQoL was adopted from the 5-point Likert scale of WHOQOL-BREF.ResultsA total of 10 items without ceiling or floor effects were selected from 20 items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with parallel analysis and Rasch analysis concluded that the 10 items were embedded in the same underlying concept. The corrected item-total correlations and factor loadings from EFA were all above 0.4. The internal consistency of the 10 items was satisfactory (Cronbach’s α = 0.84). The DMQoL total score was moderately correlated with that of WHOQOL-BREF (r = 0.48, p < 0.001). The known-group validity showed that patients with HbA1c ≤ 7% had significantly higher mean scores of DMQoL than did those with HbA1c > 8% (3.66 ± 0.47 vs. 3.41 ± 0.53; p = 0.037).ConclusionsThe DMQoL with only 10 items is developed and it is sensitive to the change of diabetes progression in early phases (e.g., glycemic changes). The combination of WHOQOL-BREF and DMQoL provides a comprehensive picture of overall HRQoL in patients with diabetes and enhance the instrument’s ability to detect clinically meaningful changes in diabetes.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0744-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Influence of Family Factors on the Quality of Life of Children With Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 in West Java, Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Analytic Study

“…Quality of life is an important indicator of patients with chronic diseases, including diabetes (Katon, et al, 2008;Murillo et al, 2017). Health-related quality of life is a multi-dimensional construct that is built from a patient's perception of the impact of a disease and its care on aspects of life, including physical, psychological, and social (Lin et al, 2017). Children and adolescents with T1DM have a lower quality of life compared to children and adolescents who are healthy, and depressions are more common in type-1diabetes (Gendelman et al, 2009).…”

ABC-tool reinvented: development of a disease-specific ‘Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool’ for multiple chronic conditions

“…PROMs either measure general health or diseasespecific health, with in most PROMs emphasis on the latter [12]. However, several studies have underlined the relevance of combining the advantages of generic and disease-specific questionnaires [2,5,13]. The ABCC-tool may combine the conveniences of both, and as suchand as far as we know -is unique in its kind.…”

“…Certainly in case of multimorbidity, care should be person-centred instead of disease-centred, mainly focused on QoL, and promote self-management using agreed personalised goals [4]. The ABCC-tool fits with the vision that care for chronic conditions should not be based on clinical outcomes alone, but also on physical, mental and social well-being [13,14]. Moreover, it is in line with the thought of integrated care, viewing the patient in a holistic perspective and leading to advice that is tailored to the patient's needs [15].…”

Reproducibility and Stationarity for the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Revision 4 (SQLS-R4) on Taiwan Population

“…Third, the sample size in this study was not large enough for us to analyze every item on SQLS-R4, and we only can analyze the staionarity for the domain scores only. The rule of thumb for calculating sample size in a factor analysis is 5 to 10 respondents per item [35]. Therefore, the sample size will be between 290 (5 respondents x 29 items x 2 time points) and 580 (10 respondents x 29 items x 2 time points) if we want to analyze the stationarity for the item scores using the CFA.…”