Abstract:The development of Dermestes maculatus (DeGeer) on four smoked fish substrates [Trigger fish (Balistes capriscus), Catfish (Synodontis sp.), African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) and Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)] were investigated as completely randomized design under laboratory temperature of 30 o C, relative humidity of 65±5% and a light: darkness regimen of 12:12 hours. Females laid eggs within 24 hours of copulation. The numbers of eggs laid and the period between larval instars were not significant… Show more
“…Differences in weights of male and female beetles that developed in different substrates were observed in earlier studies (Danho et al, 2002;Zakka, 2005). The improved variety ADV NCRE-STR that proved relatively resistant to the pest had heavier adults emerging from it; this could be due to its ability to supply nutrients that can encourage robust physical development of the pest but possibly possesses an inhibitory factor that perhaps affects oviposition, larval or pupal development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The fourteen hybrid varieties were obtained from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan germplasm, while the three local cultivars were purchased from open markets in Ali-Brada and Mile 3 both in Rivers State, Nigeria. The experimental jars and maize varieties were all sterilized thermally in a hot-air Gallenkamp oven at 60ºC for 2 hours to kill any pest and pathogen that might be present and allowed to acclimatize for 24 hours to laboratory temperature (30ºC) in the laboratory (Atijegbe, 2004;Zakka, 2005). S. zeamais culture was raised in the laboratory from infested maize collected in Choba market in Rivers State and reared on a susceptible local maize variety (Coma) in 1-Litre Kilner jars which were left on an open air shelf in the laboratory.…”
Section: Laboratory Screening Of Maize Varieties Against S Zeamais Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To standardize the age of the progeny, the adults were removed after seven days by sieving and the eggs laid were allowed to form the sub-culture. The emerging F 1 were later used for the experiment (Zakka, 2005).…”
Section: Laboratory Screening Of Maize Varieties Against S Zeamais Imentioning
The performance of different maize varieties aginst Sitophilus zeamais infestation was evaluated in a laboratory. Seventeen maize varieties comprising fourteen hybrids (ACR.97 TZL COMP.1-W, ACR.8328 BNC7, TZL COMP.4C2, OBA SUPER 1 and 2, SINE 9449-SR, IWD SYN C3F2, TZL COMP.1SYN STR-Y, TZSR White and Yellow; 95TZEE-W, MASYN VAR-3 F2, ADV.NCRE-STR and BG 97 TZE COMP.3XL) and three local cultivars (Akparike, Bende and Ogbia muno) were screened to ascertain their level of susceptibility to S. zeamais in the study area. Number of adults that emerged from the 17 varieties differed significantly (P ≤ 0.05) and ranged from 2.00 for the improved variety ADV.NCRE-STR to 62.0 in the local cultivar Bende. Significantly higher weight losses were recorded on local cultivars. Heavier males emerged from the local cultivars Akparike and Bende and lighter (P ≤ 0.05) weights were recorded on Oba super 1, TZL Comp.4C2, TZSR White, ADV.NCRE-STR and MASYN VAR-3F2. Grain hardness test showed that the hybrid variety MASYN VAR-3F2 (275.12N) was the hardest followed by TZSR-Y (259.42N) and the softest were local varieties Akparike (116.62N) and Bende (91.65N). Seed coat thickness result indicated that the local variety Akparike (0.38mm) had the highest value of seed coat thickness followed by MASYN VAR-3F2 (0.22mm) and the least seed coat thickness was BG 97 TZE COMP.3XL (0.03mm). Results indicated that the local cultivars commonly cultivated in the Niger Delta (Bende, Akparike and Ogbia muno) supported higher S. zeamais adult progeny than the improved varieties which had harder seeds and thicker coats. The fact that Akparike which has thick testa was susceptible shows that physical factors alone are not responsible for the observed resistance.
“…Differences in weights of male and female beetles that developed in different substrates were observed in earlier studies (Danho et al, 2002;Zakka, 2005). The improved variety ADV NCRE-STR that proved relatively resistant to the pest had heavier adults emerging from it; this could be due to its ability to supply nutrients that can encourage robust physical development of the pest but possibly possesses an inhibitory factor that perhaps affects oviposition, larval or pupal development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The fourteen hybrid varieties were obtained from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan germplasm, while the three local cultivars were purchased from open markets in Ali-Brada and Mile 3 both in Rivers State, Nigeria. The experimental jars and maize varieties were all sterilized thermally in a hot-air Gallenkamp oven at 60ºC for 2 hours to kill any pest and pathogen that might be present and allowed to acclimatize for 24 hours to laboratory temperature (30ºC) in the laboratory (Atijegbe, 2004;Zakka, 2005). S. zeamais culture was raised in the laboratory from infested maize collected in Choba market in Rivers State and reared on a susceptible local maize variety (Coma) in 1-Litre Kilner jars which were left on an open air shelf in the laboratory.…”
Section: Laboratory Screening Of Maize Varieties Against S Zeamais Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To standardize the age of the progeny, the adults were removed after seven days by sieving and the eggs laid were allowed to form the sub-culture. The emerging F 1 were later used for the experiment (Zakka, 2005).…”
Section: Laboratory Screening Of Maize Varieties Against S Zeamais Imentioning
The performance of different maize varieties aginst Sitophilus zeamais infestation was evaluated in a laboratory. Seventeen maize varieties comprising fourteen hybrids (ACR.97 TZL COMP.1-W, ACR.8328 BNC7, TZL COMP.4C2, OBA SUPER 1 and 2, SINE 9449-SR, IWD SYN C3F2, TZL COMP.1SYN STR-Y, TZSR White and Yellow; 95TZEE-W, MASYN VAR-3 F2, ADV.NCRE-STR and BG 97 TZE COMP.3XL) and three local cultivars (Akparike, Bende and Ogbia muno) were screened to ascertain their level of susceptibility to S. zeamais in the study area. Number of adults that emerged from the 17 varieties differed significantly (P ≤ 0.05) and ranged from 2.00 for the improved variety ADV.NCRE-STR to 62.0 in the local cultivar Bende. Significantly higher weight losses were recorded on local cultivars. Heavier males emerged from the local cultivars Akparike and Bende and lighter (P ≤ 0.05) weights were recorded on Oba super 1, TZL Comp.4C2, TZSR White, ADV.NCRE-STR and MASYN VAR-3F2. Grain hardness test showed that the hybrid variety MASYN VAR-3F2 (275.12N) was the hardest followed by TZSR-Y (259.42N) and the softest were local varieties Akparike (116.62N) and Bende (91.65N). Seed coat thickness result indicated that the local variety Akparike (0.38mm) had the highest value of seed coat thickness followed by MASYN VAR-3F2 (0.22mm) and the least seed coat thickness was BG 97 TZE COMP.3XL (0.03mm). Results indicated that the local cultivars commonly cultivated in the Niger Delta (Bende, Akparike and Ogbia muno) supported higher S. zeamais adult progeny than the improved varieties which had harder seeds and thicker coats. The fact that Akparike which has thick testa was susceptible shows that physical factors alone are not responsible for the observed resistance.
“…Females demonstrated a strong preference for ovipositing into the fur substrate as opposed to the paper or no cover situations, both in terms of the total number of progeny produced and in the rate of progeny per female. Though other studies have reported fresh or smoked fish as a diet and oviposition substrate for D. maculatus (Ezenwaji and Obayi, 2004;Zakka et al, 2013), this study used commercially available pet food as a diet with a separate oviposition substrate to facilitate the collection of individuals for bioassays. The advantages of using the dog food were that it is inexpensive, easy to obtain, does not have an objectionable odor and is shelf-stable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human food products that D. maculatus infests include dried fish (Osuji, 1975;Zakka et al, 2013), milk powders and cheese (Rajendran and Parveen, 2005) and mophane larvae (also known as phane) (Mpuchane et al, 2000). D. maculatus also infests durable goods such as hides, woolen materials (Rajendran and Parveen, 2005) and silkworm cocoons (Veer et al, 1996).…”
The intraspecific variation in larval instars is a widely distributed phenomenon amongst holometabolous insects. Several factors can affect the number of instars, such as temperature, humidity, and density. Only a few references could be found in the literature because the invariability in the number of larval instars is considered normal, and the issue has raised little to no interest. Despite this, no study to date has intended to assess or focus on the larval development. Here, we analyzed the effect of different rearing temperature on the larval stage of Dermestes maculatus DeGeer (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). The results indicated that at all temperatures, L5 represented a decisive point for individuals as well as the other later larval instars, because the next step to follow was to pupate or molt to the next larval instar. Furthermore, there were mainly two populations, L5 and L6, although in different proportions according to temperature. We also found that at a greater number of instars, the larval development at all temperatures lasted longer. Moreover, the exponential model was the best adjustment in the developmental time of all populations as well as for the accumulated developmental time of L1-L4. Thus, we conclude that random factors such as genetics could probably cause interspecific variability in D. maculatus larval development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.