2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.03.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of CXCR4 modulators based on the lead compound RB-108

Abstract: The CXCR4/CXCL12 axis plays prominent roles in tumor metastasis and inflammation. CXCR4 has been shown to be involved in a variety of inflammation-related diseases. Therefore, CXCR4 is a promising potential target to develop novel anti-inflammatory agents. Taking our previously discovered CXCR4 modulator RB-108 as the lead compound, a series of derivatives were synthesized structurally modifying and optimizing the amide and sulfamide side chains. The derivatives successfully maintained potent CXCR4 binding aff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To efficiently and expeditiously screen the binding affinity of compounds for CXCR4, our research group and collaborative teams have developed a competitive analysis method. , This method has been applied successfully for numerous years and has identified many potent CXCR4 antagonists, including a phase II clinical anti-inflammatory drug candidate Q-122. , These findings underscore the practicality of our method and its proficiency in accurately assessing the binding capability of test compounds to CXCR4. Therefore, based on our previous research, we used biotinylated TN14003 as a competitive CXCR4 antagonist and plerixafor (AMD3100) as a positive control on MDA-MB-231 cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To efficiently and expeditiously screen the binding affinity of compounds for CXCR4, our research group and collaborative teams have developed a competitive analysis method. , This method has been applied successfully for numerous years and has identified many potent CXCR4 antagonists, including a phase II clinical anti-inflammatory drug candidate Q-122. , These findings underscore the practicality of our method and its proficiency in accurately assessing the binding capability of test compounds to CXCR4. Therefore, based on our previous research, we used biotinylated TN14003 as a competitive CXCR4 antagonist and plerixafor (AMD3100) as a positive control on MDA-MB-231 cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To evaluate whether the synthesized compounds can block the CXCR4/CXCL12 pathway, we first evaluated the competitive binding inhibitory rate of each compound to CXCR4 at the concentration of 10 × 10 −9 m . [ 4,14 ] The biotinylated TN14003, a potent CXCR4 antagonist, was used in this competitive binding experiment so as to effectively avoid the use of radioisotopes. Therefore, this in vitro model is more convenient and efficient for preliminary CXCR4 modulator activity screening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of a traditional receptor built over the rhodopsin model by Palcewski et al ( 38 40 ), the human CXCR4 crystal structure (RCSB Protein Data Bank ID code 4RWS) published by Wu et al was adopted for this study ( 24 ). Most historical CXCR4 blockers are designed to contain multiple N-atoms owing to mimicking the highly positively charged nature ligand CXCL12 ( 23 , 41 49 ). Based on computer modeling studies, the most stable ligand–receptor complexes I, II, and III for three test compounds are individually generated through a docking-simulation algorithm as detailed in SI Appendix , Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%