2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of cortical folding during evolution and ontogeny

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
445
5
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 473 publications
(474 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
22
445
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that each scaling relationship could be explained comparably well by either a non-linear function ( Figure 3A) or two grade-shifted linear functions, with the best-fit linear models drawing significantly different slopes for high-GI and low-GI species ( Figure 3B-3D Figure 3D), thus providing a neuron number correlate for the GI threshold. The deviation of these results from previous work, which have shown strong phylogenetic signals associated with both GI [31,32] and neuron counts [33], may be explained both by our more than 2-fold increase in sampled species and the a priori assumption of previous work that GI and neuron number evolve as a function of phylogeny. Variation in GI, therefore, has not evolved linearly across the phylogeny, but has in fact been differentially evolved in two phenotypic groups.…”
Section: A Neocortical Threshold Gicontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…We found that each scaling relationship could be explained comparably well by either a non-linear function ( Figure 3A) or two grade-shifted linear functions, with the best-fit linear models drawing significantly different slopes for high-GI and low-GI species ( Figure 3B-3D Figure 3D), thus providing a neuron number correlate for the GI threshold. The deviation of these results from previous work, which have shown strong phylogenetic signals associated with both GI [31,32] and neuron counts [33], may be explained both by our more than 2-fold increase in sampled species and the a priori assumption of previous work that GI and neuron number evolve as a function of phylogeny. Variation in GI, therefore, has not evolved linearly across the phylogeny, but has in fact been differentially evolved in two phenotypic groups.…”
Section: A Neocortical Threshold Gicontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…27 According to previous studies, gyrification reaches its developmental peak before early toddlerhood. [33][34][35] Therefore, variations in gyrification are often discussed as useful markers for processes that evolved during a crucial period of early brain development.…”
Section: Comparison With Surface-based Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tension-induced folding suggests that strongly interconnected regions pull towards each other and lead to the formation of gyri, whereas more sparsely connected fibers elongate to leave room for sulci 10 . The "grey matter hypothesis" suggests that gyrification may be the result of cell proliferation in the outer subventricular zone during early gestation 11 . This hypothesis is based on findings in transgenic mice, which showed increased cerebral cortical SA and human-like folds after controlling the cell cycle exit of neural precursors in the outer subventricular zone 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%