Comprehensive Biomaterials 2011
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-055294-1.00270-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Contact Lenses from a Biomaterial Point of View – Materials, Manufacture, and Clinical Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transmittance values obtained fall within the range reported in literature for soft contact lenses materials [40,41]. These values remain practically constant after loading the hydrogels with the antibiotic (96.570.03% for PHEMA-T and 95.970.04% for PHEMA-UV).…”
Section: Characterization Of the Hydrogelssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The transmittance values obtained fall within the range reported in literature for soft contact lenses materials [40,41]. These values remain practically constant after loading the hydrogels with the antibiotic (96.570.03% for PHEMA-T and 95.970.04% for PHEMA-UV).…”
Section: Characterization Of the Hydrogelssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The transmittance of the coated hydrogel with both types of liposome (DMPC and DMPC + CHOL) was not significantly affected relatively to the control sample; all the measured samples have over 90% transparency, matching the minimum transmittance value required for SCLs . In detail, the DMPC coating decreases the hydrogel transmittance from 99.0 ± 0.2% to 98.7 ± 0.3% while the DMPC + CHOL coating reduces the transmittance to 97.6 ± 0.4%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These observations are in agreement with the QCM-D results: the higher stiffness and viscosity of the DMPC 1 CHOL liposomes suggests that they are more resistant to rupture because the lipids are more densely packed, as described in Serro et al 26 The transmittance of the coated hydrogel with both types of liposome (DMPC and DMPC 1 CHOL) was not significantly affected relatively to the control sample; all the measured samples have over 90% transparency, matching the minimum transmittance value required for SCLs. 42 In detail, the DMPC coating decreases the hydrogel transmittance from 99.0 6 0.2% to 98.7 6 0.3% while the DMPC 1 CHOL coating reduces the transmittance to 97.6 6 0.4%. Figure 6 compares the cumulative release curves of LVF obtained in static sink conditions with those obtained under friction conditions, which attempt to simulate the eye blinking effect.…”
Section: Coating Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Both mixtures were injected into a mould consisting of two silanized glass plates separated by a spacer of polyurethane or teflon. The glass plates were silanized with a solution of dimethyldichlorosilane in carbon tetrachloride according to the procedure described by Vazquez et al to facilitate the hydrogel removal from the mould. After silanization, the glasses were rinsed with dichloromethane and dried with nitrogen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%