2004
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7445.950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of clinical ethics committees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
93
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
93
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They also aim to embrace, rather than deny, the plurality of values and opinions that can inform such decisions. The effectiveness of ethics support services [13,20,25,26,29,37,46] and development [4,10,16,28,30,34,36,40] has been the object of growing research. The focus of this study, however, has been the examination of existing services [1,7,17] As ethics support services become more prevalent, their growth into entities that are as useful as possible will depend in part on data exploring how well their structure and location fit with the needs of clinicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also aim to embrace, rather than deny, the plurality of values and opinions that can inform such decisions. The effectiveness of ethics support services [13,20,25,26,29,37,46] and development [4,10,16,28,30,34,36,40] has been the object of growing research. The focus of this study, however, has been the examination of existing services [1,7,17] As ethics support services become more prevalent, their growth into entities that are as useful as possible will depend in part on data exploring how well their structure and location fit with the needs of clinicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies of ethics support services have sought to establish aspects such as: the prevalence of support services, their type, structure, composition, main functions, activities and processes (see for example McGee et al, 2001;Slowther et al, , 2004Slowther, McClimans, and Price, 2012;Godkin et al, 2005;Milmore, 2006;Fox, Myers, and Pearlman, 2007;Frewer and Fahr, 2007;Swetz et al, 2007;Pedersen, Akre, and Førde, 2009;Romano et al, 2009;Whitehead et al, 2009;Kesselheim, Johnson, and Joffe, 2010;Gaudine et al, 2010;Nelson et al, 2010b;Tapper et al, 2010;Moeller et al, 2012). What these studies mostly show is the diversity of CES services.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ces Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al (2009) report on hospitals in Shanghai, many of which review the ethics of proposed research, in addition to these three functions. Slowther et al (2004) report the standard three functions for clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom and Pedersen et al (2008) report on the ethics consultation function in nine Norwegian hospital committees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%