1991
DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2002_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Child Psychotherapy Process Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary analyses showed marginally positive (and mostly nonsignificant) correlations among these factors across the three informants (for the Diffusion sample, average r = .19; for the CDA sample, average r = .18). These results correspond with those obtained by other child process researchers who found poor agreement in therapy process ratings across sources (e.g., Eltz, Shirk, & Sarlin, 1995;Shirk & Saiz, 1992;Smith-Acuna, Durlak, & Kaspar, 1991) and suggest that attempts to find common variance across informants might result in an adherence construct with little practical meaning. For this reason, we decided to evaluate the two core models (i.e., family functioning/cohesion and parent monitoring) using alternative measures of adherence (i.e., caregiver, youth, and therapist).…”
Section: Measures: Diffusion Projectsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Preliminary analyses showed marginally positive (and mostly nonsignificant) correlations among these factors across the three informants (for the Diffusion sample, average r = .19; for the CDA sample, average r = .18). These results correspond with those obtained by other child process researchers who found poor agreement in therapy process ratings across sources (e.g., Eltz, Shirk, & Sarlin, 1995;Shirk & Saiz, 1992;Smith-Acuna, Durlak, & Kaspar, 1991) and suggest that attempts to find common variance across informants might result in an adherence construct with little practical meaning. For this reason, we decided to evaluate the two core models (i.e., family functioning/cohesion and parent monitoring) using alternative measures of adherence (i.e., caregiver, youth, and therapist).…”
Section: Measures: Diffusion Projectsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although the degree of child-therapist convergence far exceeded that found by other child psychotherapy researchers for other process dimensions (cf. Smith-Acuna et al, 1991), these results indicated that the two perspectives are not interchangeable and that each participant makes a unique contribution to understanding the affective quality of the therapeutic relationship. Interestingly, there was greater convergence between child and therapist for the affective quality of the relationship than for ratings of task collaboration.…”
Section: The Therapeutic Alliance Scales For Childrenmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Advances in studying processes have been facilitated greatly by die development of measurement strategies including rating scales and direct observational codes to sample therapy sessions and client and therapist experiences (Lambert & Hill, 1994). Despite a few noteworthy attempts to study therapy processes in child treatment (e.g., Shirk & Saiz, 1992; Smith‐Acuna, Durlak, & Kaspar, 1991), this area is sorely neglected.…”
Section: Recommended Directions For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%