2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of buccal film formulations and their mucoadhesive performance in biomimetic models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear relationship between the sample area and the measured values can be confirmed by the regression coefficient of R 2 (F max ) = 0.9996 and R 2 (W ad ) = 0.8164. An approximately linear relationship between the sample area with the adhesion work and the maximum detachment force has also been observed by Göbel et al [ 47 ] when they investigated the influence of the sample area of circular HPMC and PVA films with a diameter of 5–20 mm on adhesion to gelatin type A gels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The linear relationship between the sample area and the measured values can be confirmed by the regression coefficient of R 2 (F max ) = 0.9996 and R 2 (W ad ) = 0.8164. An approximately linear relationship between the sample area with the adhesion work and the maximum detachment force has also been observed by Göbel et al [ 47 ] when they investigated the influence of the sample area of circular HPMC and PVA films with a diameter of 5–20 mm on adhesion to gelatin type A gels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…As the swelling of the PVA progresses, however, adhesion again decreases as the previously dry and hydrophilic film decomposes over time to a gel-like structure that adheres more poorly to the agar/mucin gel. Göbel et al [ 47 ] investigated the influence of the contact time of PVA films on gelatin type A gels in vitro. They could not observe a clear trend in the observed time from 3–120 s of contact time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] The bond strength increases with a certain level of hydration until a threshold is reached, beyond which excessive hydration leads to a sudden decline in adhesive quality due to unraveling at the interface between the polymer and mucosal tissue. [21] Mucoadhesion is usually affected by the level of H-bonding especially with moieties having carboxylic, hydroxylic or amino groups. This is evident from the varying level of mucoadhesive characteristics shown by different polymers in formulations F1, F6 and F9 (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commercially available synthetic polymer PAA and its derivatives are characterized by high mucoadhesive properties [ 100 ]. Various polymers, such as polycarbophil, several types of carbomer homopolymers and copolymers, have been confirmed as successful mucoadhesive matrices for the development of oral patches.…”
Section: Bioadhesive Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%