2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of brain networks involved in spoken word processing of Mandarin Chinese

Abstract: Developmental differences in phonological and orthographic processing of Chinese spoken words were examined in 9-year-olds, 11-year-olds and adults using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Rhyming and spelling judgments were made to two-character words presented sequentially in the auditory modality. Developmental comparisons between adults and both groups of children combined showed that age-related changes in activation in visuo-orthographic regions depended on task. There were developmental incre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, this group-wise difference in processing onset mismatches suggests that top-down processing does not influence spoken word recognition in children to the same extent that it does in adults. This finding complements earlier work using fMRI showing that top-down modulation from prefrontal areas of the brain is weaker in children compared to adults during spoken word recognition tasks (Bitan et al, 2006; Bitan et al, 2009; Cao et al, 2011). However, there is another explanation for this difference between groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, this group-wise difference in processing onset mismatches suggests that top-down processing does not influence spoken word recognition in children to the same extent that it does in adults. This finding complements earlier work using fMRI showing that top-down modulation from prefrontal areas of the brain is weaker in children compared to adults during spoken word recognition tasks (Bitan et al, 2006; Bitan et al, 2009; Cao et al, 2011). However, there is another explanation for this difference between groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Nevertheless, we hypothesize that rhyme effects will be stronger in adults compared to children, as recent work using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has shown that top-down modulation is weaker in children compared to adults during tasks of spoken word recognition (Bitan et al, 2006; Bitan, Cheon, Lu, Burman, & Booth, 2009). It could be the case that this effect is especially prominent in Mandarin (Cao et al, 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is already substantial empirical evidence within the literature to support such a position with Chinese literates who have not been exposed to an alphabetic writing system displaying reduced levels of phonological awareness (Cheung et al, 2001;Ho & Bryant, 1997;Huang & Hanley, 1995McBride-Chang et al, 2004;Read et al, 1986;Shu et al, 2008). Further, recent evidence from neuroimaging studies support the critical role of orthographic transparency in modulating effects of literacy on speech processing, with less involvement of associated orthographic processing regions observed in logographic literates compared to alphabetic literates when processing speech (Cao et al, 2011) and greater developmental changes in phonological processing regions as a consequence of literacy training in English over Chinese students (Brennan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…phonemes) it has been proposed that explicit training is necessary. Evidence in support of this position comes from observed similarities in processing between illiterates and logographic literates, for example Chinese literates, where there is little systematic correspondence between orthographic representations and the sequence of speech sounds that constitute their spoken form (Brennan, Cao, Pedroarena-Leal, McNorgan, & Booth, 2013;Cao et al, 2011;Cheung, Chen, Lai, Wong, & Hills, 2001;Ho & Bryant, 1997;Huang & Hanley, 1995McBride-Chang, Bialystok, Chong, & Li, 2004;Read, Yun-Fei, Hong-Yin, & Bao-Qing, 1986;Shu, Peng, & McBride-Chang, 2008). …”
Section: Changes To Phonological Representations and Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These regions are also typically active in young Chinese readers during phonological reading tasks (Cao et al, 2010, 2011; Brennan et al, 2012; Bolger et al, 2008; Siok et al, 2004, 2008), possibly due to children’s greater morphological processing when reading in Chinese (McBride-Chang et al, 2013). We hypothesized that English-speaking children (ages 6–12) should also exhibit significant activation in left ventral inferior (BA 47) and middle frontal (MFG BA 9) regions during an auditory morphology task.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%