2023
DOI: 10.1159/000528012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Best Evidence Dosing Recommendations for Term and Preterm Neonates (NeoDose Project)

Abstract: <b><i>Abstract:</i></b> Many drugs are used off-label in neonates which leads to large variation in prescribed drugs and dosages in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The NeoDose project aimed to develop best evidence dosing recommendations (DRs) for term and preterm neonates using a three-step approach: 1) drug selection, 2) establishing consensus-based DRs, and 3) establishing best evidence DRs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The selection of drugs was based on fre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is of relevance, as it became clear through this work that there are both similarities and dissimilarities in workflow, organization and type of information provided, the knowledge of which may help to direct clinicians to the most appropriate formulary for specific DI. It was therefore quite interesting to notice that this type of information is not easily available in the public domain, although DPF and Swisspeddose have published their workflow and approach, while ANMF describe their workflow and governance on their website [12,13,15,16]. Other formularies provide information on how to use their platform and how it is structured in their own help sections, which are available to subscribers only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is of relevance, as it became clear through this work that there are both similarities and dissimilarities in workflow, organization and type of information provided, the knowledge of which may help to direct clinicians to the most appropriate formulary for specific DI. It was therefore quite interesting to notice that this type of information is not easily available in the public domain, although DPF and Swisspeddose have published their workflow and approach, while ANMF describe their workflow and governance on their website [12,13,15,16]. Other formularies provide information on how to use their platform and how it is structured in their own help sections, which are available to subscribers only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dedicated project to further develop the neonatal dosing regimens (NEODOSE) has recently been reported [13].…”
Section: The 'Dutch' Pediatric Formulary (Dpf Also Known As 'Kinderfo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For neonates and children, the literature supports initial dosing ranges from 3 to 7.5 mg/kg and 4 to 10 mg/kg, respectively, usually given once daily, with subsequent doses determined by TDM [18][19][20][21][22]. The Dutch Pediatric Formulary (DPF) aims to unify prescribing for neonates and children, by providing best evidence-based dosing recommendations, and is currently the national standard for pediatric pharmacotherapy in the Netherlands [23,24]. In the Beatrix Children's Hospital (Beatrix KinderZiekenhuis, BKZ), dosing recommendations of the DPF are followed for children above 1 month of age, while they are not for neonates (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a setting of limited resources ('money and people') with emerging new workflows like the benefit-risk assessment of off-label drug use in children (BRAVO) framework or the NEODOSE approach as new approaches, collaboration is very likely needed to really improve the assessment of the available evidence and produce evidence-based data, subsequently converted into bedside clinically useful drug information for neonates [4,5]. Such workflows can be further supported via the integration of physiology-based pharmacokinetics to generate or support dosing recommendations [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%