2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-020-03167-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of benchmark automation suite and evaluation of various high-performance computing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, benchmarking a cluster is a complex and expensive procedure. The availability of special tools to automate this process [6] only slightly reduces the testing cost. Therefore, the problem of obtaining simple formulae that allow calculating the performance of a cluster with an acceptable error (up to 3%) and studying the dependence of this performance on its main parameters without resorting to a real testing procedure is very relevant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, benchmarking a cluster is a complex and expensive procedure. The availability of special tools to automate this process [6] only slightly reduces the testing cost. Therefore, the problem of obtaining simple formulae that allow calculating the performance of a cluster with an acceptable error (up to 3%) and studying the dependence of this performance on its main parameters without resorting to a real testing procedure is very relevant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…processor performance • node performance • number of nodes • system connectivity (Ethernet, InfiniBand, Omni-Path, etc.) • network topology (Fat Tree [6], Dragonfly [7], Jellyfish [8], 6D Torus [9], etc.) It is rather difficult to reveal the actual dependence of R max on the listed parameters, since some of them cannot be determined numerically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%