2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.919782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of bacterial display peptides for use in biosensing applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Binding to SEB and SAPE for the R441 sample, as measured by median fluorescence, is comparable to the unlabeled controls for R338, R418, and R445. The result is similar to using percentage of cells outside of a gated, buffer‐only control, which is the method previously utilized in peptide bacterial display studies (Kogot et al ., ; Stratis‐Cullum et al, ). The R418 clone was bound at 11.6% to PA, 4.5% to SAPE, and approximately 11% to α HA, and 10.2% to NAPE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding to SEB and SAPE for the R441 sample, as measured by median fluorescence, is comparable to the unlabeled controls for R338, R418, and R445. The result is similar to using percentage of cells outside of a gated, buffer‐only control, which is the method previously utilized in peptide bacterial display studies (Kogot et al ., ; Stratis‐Cullum et al, ). The R418 clone was bound at 11.6% to PA, 4.5% to SAPE, and approximately 11% to α HA, and 10.2% to NAPE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the MMS and a bacterial display library enables the rapid isolation and subsequent identification of a peptide reagent as an antibody alternative in less than one week [27]; each round of MMS sorting with bacterial display requires one-day for target binding, MMS sorting, and overnight growth of enriched, positively selected clones. Besides being semi-automated, the MMS sorting is performed in closed-system with a disposable cartridge to limit user exposure to dangerous biological targets [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, antibodies (including engineered antibodies) usually require several weeks if not months to isolate from living hosts, whereas recent advances have demonstrated that synthetic routes can be employed using various synthetic peptide recognition element technologies (e.g., bacterial display and phage display) to produce bioreceptors in as little as a few days to a couple of weeks Stratis-Cullum et al, 2012. In this work, the extremely fast replication rate of bacteria and biological components (e.g., modified proteins) on an E. coli cell surface are harnessed to produce the peptide library of binders (Daugherty, 2007;Kogot et al, 2011;Stratis-Cullum et al, 2012). Although, several variations of combinatorial peptide technologies, including yeast, phage, and bacterial display and other chemically synthetic techniques, are currently used to isolate synthetic reagents, bacterial display with unconstrained bacterial peptide display technology shows great potential.…”
Section: Bacterial Displaymentioning
confidence: 99%