2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2020.101388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of autoantibody signatures for common cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, TA autoantibodies are more stable in vitro than other protein biomarkers, which facilitates their detection. Because of these advantages, TA autoantibodies are emerging as strong candidates for clinically useful cancer biomarkers [18]. However, TA autoantibody's diagnostic efficacy is often very low, limiting the development of relevant diagnostics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, TA autoantibodies are more stable in vitro than other protein biomarkers, which facilitates their detection. Because of these advantages, TA autoantibodies are emerging as strong candidates for clinically useful cancer biomarkers [18]. However, TA autoantibody's diagnostic efficacy is often very low, limiting the development of relevant diagnostics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been used to identify valuable TAAbs in cancers, among which serological analysis of expression cDNA libraries (SEREX) and serological proteome analysis (SERPA) are the most commonly used technologies (29)(30)(31). However, the false-positive rate of SEREX is too high, and the construction of a cDNA gene expression library from patients is time-consuming and unrepresentative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a multitude of strategies available for discovery of tumor antigens directed autoantibodies in circulation. Each strategy targets a different repertoire of antigens and presents both advantages and disadvantages as we have previously outlined in a review [21]. The primary intent of this study is to explore the relationship of the autoantibody response in ovarian cancer to pathogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined performance of these three markers resulted in an AUC of 0.9576 ( Figure 1C). Released antigens may occur in circulation bound to Ig [15,[19][20][21]. We profiled ovarian cancer circulating Ig-bound proteins in ovarian cancer subjects compared to controls using tandem mass tag (TMT)-based liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS).…”
Section: Recombinant Protein Array-based Ovarian Cancer Autoantibody mentioning
confidence: 99%