2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89098-8_61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Assembly Process Information Management System Using Model-Based Definition Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those core concepts have been used in several approaches targeting different assembly-related activities, e.g., assembly sequencing (Sung et al 2001;Ullah et al 2009;Neb and Hitzer 2020), assembly planning (Case and Wan Harun 1999;Bronsvoort and Noort 2004), and virtual assembly (Shyamsundar and Gadh 2001;Zhu et al 2010a;Wang et al 2013;Adamson et al 2019). These approaches have proposed different forms of representing assembly information, ranging from international standards for product information representation (Fenves 2002;Rachuri et al 2006;ISO 2018) to databases (Shah and Rogers 1988; Roy and Liu 1988;Kang and Nnaji 1993), ontologies (Dartigues et al 2007;Fiorentini et al 2007;Barbau et al 2012;Hasan et al 2014a;Huang et al 2015), model-based definitions (Ye et al 2015;Wan et al2016;Zeng et al 2021), among others. However, the continuous appearance of new concepts and approaches denotes the need for a unified way to represent assembly-related aspects that could be applied during the whole product development process and comprises the perspectives of all its participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those core concepts have been used in several approaches targeting different assembly-related activities, e.g., assembly sequencing (Sung et al 2001;Ullah et al 2009;Neb and Hitzer 2020), assembly planning (Case and Wan Harun 1999;Bronsvoort and Noort 2004), and virtual assembly (Shyamsundar and Gadh 2001;Zhu et al 2010a;Wang et al 2013;Adamson et al 2019). These approaches have proposed different forms of representing assembly information, ranging from international standards for product information representation (Fenves 2002;Rachuri et al 2006;ISO 2018) to databases (Shah and Rogers 1988; Roy and Liu 1988;Kang and Nnaji 1993), ontologies (Dartigues et al 2007;Fiorentini et al 2007;Barbau et al 2012;Hasan et al 2014a;Huang et al 2015), model-based definitions (Ye et al 2015;Wan et al2016;Zeng et al 2021), among others. However, the continuous appearance of new concepts and approaches denotes the need for a unified way to represent assembly-related aspects that could be applied during the whole product development process and comprises the perspectives of all its participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And they proposed a digital platform data integration technology architecture for radar assembly shops, which solved the cross-platform quality data exchange problem and reduced the coupling degree of their system integration (Ben, 2020). The assembly process information management system was designed, using Microsoft SQL Server as the database management system to achieve integration with the workshop information management system (Zeng et al , 2021). An information technology model was presented to integrate heterogeneous quality-related information on the vehicle assembly production process (Gewohn et al , 2018a; Gewohn et al , 2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%