1952
DOI: 10.21236/ad0000191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Armed Forces Qualification Test and Predecessor Army Screening Tests, 1946-1950

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…General cognitive ability (GCA) was assessed using the 100-item multiple-choice Armed Forces Qualification Test (Uhlaner and Bolanovich, 1952). The test is highly correlated with other tests of GCA, such as Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (r=0.84) (Uhlaner and Bolanovich, 1952).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General cognitive ability (GCA) was assessed using the 100-item multiple-choice Armed Forces Qualification Test (Uhlaner and Bolanovich, 1952). The test is highly correlated with other tests of GCA, such as Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (r=0.84) (Uhlaner and Bolanovich, 1952).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants took the same version of the Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT), a 100-item multiple-choice test of GCA, when inducted into the military at approximately age 20 and again as part of the study at age 62 ( Uhlaner & Bolanovich, 1952 ). This test is a reliable and valid measure of GCA ( Uhlaner & Bolanovich, 1952 ) and is highly correlated with other tests of GCA, such as Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale ( r = 0.84) ( Lyons et al, 2009 ). Age 20 AFQT scores were obtained from military records by the VETR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items include the four domains of vocabulary, arithmetic word problems, knowledge and reasoning about tools and mechanical relations, and visual-spatial processing (Uhlaner & Bolanovich, 1952). The AFQT is highly correlated (~.85) with traditional measures of IQ or GCA in VETSA and in other samples (Lyons et al, 2009) and served as our measure of GCA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%