2021
DOI: 10.1080/17543266.2021.1916839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Apparel Product Evaluation (APE) framework: a systematic classification of evaluative criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 450 valid responses were obtained between September and November 2022 and used for statistical analysis. The independent variables were utilitarian, hedonic, differential, and social value (Jung et al 2014;Lin & Huang, 2012), pro-environmentalism, social responsibility (Jung & Oh, 2019), perceived consumer effectiveness (Ellen, Wiener, & Cobb-Walgren, 1991), environmental knowledge Kim & Damhorst, 1998), aesthetic criteria, functional criteria, sustainable criteria and brand criteria (Ghalachyan & Karpova, 2021) with generation cohort as moderator variable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 450 valid responses were obtained between September and November 2022 and used for statistical analysis. The independent variables were utilitarian, hedonic, differential, and social value (Jung et al 2014;Lin & Huang, 2012), pro-environmentalism, social responsibility (Jung & Oh, 2019), perceived consumer effectiveness (Ellen, Wiener, & Cobb-Walgren, 1991), environmental knowledge Kim & Damhorst, 1998), aesthetic criteria, functional criteria, sustainable criteria and brand criteria (Ghalachyan & Karpova, 2021) with generation cohort as moderator variable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical comfort relates to ease of wear, fabrication, design, finishing, and garment assembly. According to Ghalachyan and Karpova (2021), physical comfort is also linked closely with the functional properties that involve the ease of wearing a garment. Psychological comfort refers to a feeling of satisfaction or dissatisfaction towards the garment, and this is usually related to factors that affect the body and size (Ghalachyan & Karpova, 2021;Shin & Damhorst, 2018;Frost, 1988).…”
Section: Psychological Comfortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ghalachyan and Karpova (2021), physical comfort is also linked closely with the functional properties that involve the ease of wearing a garment. Psychological comfort refers to a feeling of satisfaction or dissatisfaction towards the garment, and this is usually related to factors that affect the body and size (Ghalachyan & Karpova, 2021;Shin & Damhorst, 2018;Frost, 1988). Concerning psychological comfort, this deals with dissatisfaction with factors such as design, fabric, finishing, and detailing that somehow would affect discomfort in certain body areas.…”
Section: Psychological Comfortmentioning
confidence: 99%