2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2012.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an untargeted metabolomics method for the analysis of human faecal samples using Cryptosporidium-infected samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
68
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus far, few studies have investigated optimal sampling conditions for fecal VOC analysis, mostly using the chemical analytical technique “gas chromatography-mass spectrometry” (GC-MS) [23,24,25,26,27]. GC-MS allows for identification of individual VOCs, based on their physiochemical properties, whereas an eNose harbors a chemical array sensor system, allowing for identification of complex gaseous mixtures by deploying pattern recognition algorithms [3,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus far, few studies have investigated optimal sampling conditions for fecal VOC analysis, mostly using the chemical analytical technique “gas chromatography-mass spectrometry” (GC-MS) [23,24,25,26,27]. GC-MS allows for identification of individual VOCs, based on their physiochemical properties, whereas an eNose harbors a chemical array sensor system, allowing for identification of complex gaseous mixtures by deploying pattern recognition algorithms [3,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reade and colleagues demonstrated eight compounds to be detectable at significant higher intensities in samples weighing 450 mg compared to samples with a mass of 100 mg (2,3-butanedione, tetrahydrofurane, ethyl ester propanoic acid, n-propyl acetate, 2-pentenal E, propyl ester propanoic acid, 2-methylpropanal and 1-propanol) [16]. In contrast, results of fecal VOC profile comparison between samples containing higher masses are ambiguous [23,24,26]. Reade and colleagues state in their manuscript that the applied solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) fiber, required for capturing fecal VOCs prior to analysis, reached its limit of absorbance at 0.45 g [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a following study the same group suggested methanol as the optimum organic solvent and a ratio of 1/2 volumes of fecal water to ice-cold methanol [45]. Ng et al, [46] proposed a ratio of 1/5 (sample to methanol volume) as the optimal for GC-MS analysis of human fecal samples.…”
Section: Gc-ms Profiling Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Till now only few studies have dealt with the optimisation of the method used for the sample preparation of feces. In these studies metabolomics analysis was performed by NMR spectroscopy [41][42][43] and GC-MS [44][45][46][47][48] and the investigated parameters included freeze-drying, sonication, filtration, homogenization, sample weight to buffer/solvent ratio, extraction solvent, pH value, extraction duration and repetitions numbers. Up to date there is no study of the optimum treatment conditions of fecal samples for metabolic fingerprinting by LC-MS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent preliminary metabolomics study on Cryptosporidium developed a faecal metabolite extraction method for untargeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis using Cryptosporidium positive and negative human faecal samples [12]. In that study, faecal metabolite profiles of cryptosporidiosis positive patients could be differentiated from cryptosporidiosis negative patients, suggesting that metabolic homeostasis and intestinal permeability were affected as a result of the infection [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%