Development of an undergraduate nursing clinical evaluation form (CEF)

Porter, Joanne E.; Al‐Motlaq, Mohammad; Hutchinson, Cheryl; Sellick, Kenneth John; Burns, Vanessa; James, Ainsley

doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2010.12.016

Cited by 3 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This was developed by Porter et al [8] in 2011. It is an evaluation tool that can be used by nursing students to provide feedback at the end of the clinical practice process.…”

Section: Undergraduate Nursing Clinical Evaluation Form (Cef)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The lowest score that can be obtained from the form is 21 and the highest score is 105. The Cronbach's α value of the form is 0.90 [8].…”

Section: Undergraduate Nursing Clinical Evaluation Form (Cef)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Factors such as the type of clinical setting, attitudes, and the experiences of the instructor are important in shaping the clinical experience of students [8]. Relevant studies have focused on identifying students' current and previous clinical practice experiences, and their perceptions of the clinical training process [1,9,[10][11][12].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, students are also expected to give feedback about their experiences after the clinical practice. It is very important for the evaluation process that educators be provided with feedback that adequately represents the views of the students because health care organizations require student feedback to shape educational programs and activities for personal development [8].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study was thus conducted to test the Turkish validity and reliability of the Undergraduate Nursing Clinical Evaluation Form (CEF) developed by Porter et al [8].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Turkish adaptation of the undergraduate nursing clinical evaluation form: a validity and reliability study

Arkan

Pehlıvan

Yılmaz

et al. 2021

The European Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:The study was conducted for the purpose of determining the validity and reliability of the "Undergraduate Nursing Clinical Evaluation Form (CEF)" in a Turkish sample. Methods: One hundred sixty-seven students enrolled in Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Nursing participated in the study. Study data were collected via the Student Description Form and CEF. The Cronbach's α internal consistency coefficient was calculated for the reliability of the total scale. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between items and total scores. Results: In the validity of the scale, CFA was used to investigate the consistency of the scale with the original scale. When the fit indices of the model tested using CFA were examined, it was seen that the chi-square value was significant. When the Cronbach's α reliability coefficients were examined, the reliability of the form was found to be quite good in terms of domains and total score. The correlations between the items and total scale score ranged between 0.42 and 0.77. Cronbach's α coefficient was greater than 0.90 for each item. Conclusions: Undergraduate Nursing Clinical Evaluation Form is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in the Turkish culture.

show abstract

“…This was developed by Porter et al [8] in 2011. It is an evaluation tool that can be used by nursing students to provide feedback at the end of the clinical practice process.…”

Section: Undergraduate Nursing Clinical Evaluation Form (Cef)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The lowest score that can be obtained from the form is 21 and the highest score is 105. The Cronbach's α value of the form is 0.90 [8].…”

Section: Undergraduate Nursing Clinical Evaluation Form (Cef)mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study was thus conducted to test the Turkish validity and reliability of the Undergraduate Nursing Clinical Evaluation Form (CEF) developed by Porter et al [8].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Turkish adaptation of the undergraduate nursing clinical evaluation form: a validity and reliability study

Arkan

Pehlıvan

Yılmaz

et al. 2021

The European Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Evaluating students' perception of their clinical placements — Testing the clinical learning environment and supervision and nurse teacher scale (CLES+T scale) in Germany

Bergjan

Hertel

2013

Nurse Education Today

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Appraisal and Evaluation of the Learning Environment Instruments of the Student Nurse: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN Methodology

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Nursing education consists of theory and practice, and student nurses’ perception of the learning environment, both educational and clinical, is one of the elements that determines the success or failure of their university study path. This study aimed to identify the currently available tools for measuring the clinical and educational learning environments of student nurses and to evaluate their measurement properties in order to provide solid evidence for researchers, educators, and clinical tutors to use in the selection of tools. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the psychometric properties of self-reported learning environment tools in accordance with the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Guidelines of 2018. The research was conducted on the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, and ERIC. Results: In the literature, 14 instruments were found that evaluate both the traditional and simulated clinical learning environments and the educational learning environments of student nurses. These tools can be ideally divided into first-generation tools developed from different learning theories and second-generation tools developed by mixing, reviewing, and integrating different already-validated tools. Conclusion: Not all the relevant psychometric properties of the instruments were evaluated, and the methodological approaches used were often doubtful or inadequate, thus threatening the instruments’ external validity. Further research is needed to complete the validation processes undertaken for both new and already developed instruments, using higher-quality methods and evaluating all psychometric properties.

show abstract

Development of an undergraduate nursing clinical evaluation form (CEF)

Cited by 3 publications

References 15 publications

Turkish adaptation of the undergraduate nursing clinical evaluation form: a validity and reliability study

Turkish adaptation of the undergraduate nursing clinical evaluation form: a validity and reliability study

Evaluating students' perception of their clinical placements — Testing the clinical learning environment and supervision and nurse teacher scale (CLES+T scale) in Germany

Appraisal and Evaluation of the Learning Environment Instruments of the Student Nurse: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN Methodology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About