33rd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1997
DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-2778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an ion thruster and power processor for New Millennium's Deep Space 1 Mission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical values listed in Table 1 are not to be taken as recommended design values, but only as indicative of a range; for more detailed information, the reader is referred to the quoted literature. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] …”
Section: Electric Thrustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical values listed in Table 1 are not to be taken as recommended design values, but only as indicative of a range; for more detailed information, the reader is referred to the quoted literature. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] …”
Section: Electric Thrustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lifetime values so obtained can be compared to those required by previous missions where GIEs were employed and to those required by the HiPER missions. In particular, the lifetime obtained for the TypGIE is sufficient to achieve the requirements of the Deep Space 1 and GOCE mission (about 20 000 h [12], [40]) and of the Bepi Colombo mission (about 17 000 h [13]) but not enough if compared to the requirements specified in Table II. On the contrary, the DS3G shows lifetime in excess of those required by past missions and of those required by the HiPER project ( 28 000 h for the EML1 infrastructure and 45-48 000 h for Mars Infrastructure and NEP mission to Saturn).…”
Section: B Lifetime Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 illustrates these challenges by comparing the technology needs for JIMO with current SOA ion thruster technology as represented by the NASA Solar Electric Power Technology Application Readiness (NSTAR) thruster recently flown on NASA Deep-Space 1 spacecraft. 4 Figure 5 shows these challenges with respect to each electric propulsion subsystem. This comparison highlights technology areas requiring improvement for JIMO applications.…”
Section: Jimo Technology Challenges For Ion Propulsionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been successfully used in both the NSTAR and NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) programs. 4,5 However, enlargement of the thruster is not enough to handle the fuel throughput requirement of JIMO type applications. The grid materials need to be more resistant to erosion than the molybdenum materials used in the NSTAR program.…”
Section: Jimo Technology Challenges For Ion Propulsionmentioning
confidence: 99%