2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an ion exchange system for plating wastewater treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective treatment of heavy metals from industrial effluent has been one of the major issues due to their toxicities. Among all conventional treatment methods, heavy metals can be removed by chemical precipitation,1 ion exchange resins,2 and adsorption 3. Recently, chelate membranes have been applied for the adsorption of specific metal ions from industrial wastes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective treatment of heavy metals from industrial effluent has been one of the major issues due to their toxicities. Among all conventional treatment methods, heavy metals can be removed by chemical precipitation,1 ion exchange resins,2 and adsorption 3. Recently, chelate membranes have been applied for the adsorption of specific metal ions from industrial wastes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regenerate can be treated more easily to recover metals and other process-salts. Recoveries of over 97% have been reported (Eom et al, 2005).…”
Section: Ion Exchangementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because heavy metals are generally toxic and non-biodegradable, they can be accumulated in living organisms and pose a risk to the ecosystem and human health. At present time, there are many conventional methods for removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater, including chemical precipitation (Lin et al 2005), oxidation-reduction (Chang 2005), ion exchange (Eom et al 2005), adsorption (Mohan & Chander 2006), membrane filtration (Zhong et al 2007) and electrolytic methods (Feng et al 2007). However, these methods have the limitations of their low efficiency, high operational cost and sludge generation (Chen & Wang 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%