2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83512-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an integrated peri-urban wetland degradation assessment approach for the Chatra Wetland in eastern India

Abstract: The loss of peri-urban wetlands is a major side effect of urbanization in India in recent days. Timely and proper assessment of wetland area change is essential for the conservation of wetlands. This study follows the integrated way of the peri-urban wetland degradation assessment in the case of medium and small-size urban agglomerations with a special focus on Chatra Wetland. Analysis of land-use and land cover (LULC) maps of the past 28 years shows a decrease of 60% area of the wetland including marshy land.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the second national wetland survey conducted by China's State Forestry Administration between 2009 and 2013, which was based on China Brazil Earth Resources Satellite remote sensing and field measurements, wetland area was reduced by 33,963 km 2 , with a loss rate of 8.82% compared to the first national wetland survey [6]. It is evident that there has been a dramatic degradation and loss of wetlands over the past few decades in China [7], and the driving factors of wetland degradation and fragmentation may be related to the continuously changing climate conditions, intensive human disturbance, associated pollution, and human need for water and biological resources [2,6,[8][9][10]. Wetland landscape fragmentation can be determined using the spatial distribution of vegetation (e.g., the shape, size, and quantity of landscape features) [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the second national wetland survey conducted by China's State Forestry Administration between 2009 and 2013, which was based on China Brazil Earth Resources Satellite remote sensing and field measurements, wetland area was reduced by 33,963 km 2 , with a loss rate of 8.82% compared to the first national wetland survey [6]. It is evident that there has been a dramatic degradation and loss of wetlands over the past few decades in China [7], and the driving factors of wetland degradation and fragmentation may be related to the continuously changing climate conditions, intensive human disturbance, associated pollution, and human need for water and biological resources [2,6,[8][9][10]. Wetland landscape fragmentation can be determined using the spatial distribution of vegetation (e.g., the shape, size, and quantity of landscape features) [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite imagery, such as Landsat, ASTER, SPOT, AVHRR and MODIS, provide long-term spatial data archives for ecological assessment, monitoring and management purposes (Muavhi and Mavhungu 2020). These images have been used in various studies, for example, on LULC change, wetland monitoring and extent mapping, biomass estimation and mapping, soil moisture applications, inundation mapping and water level monitoring (Basu et al 2021;Chatziantoniou et al 2017;Connolly 2018;Ligate et al 2018;Mudereri et al, 2019;Munishi and Jewitt 2019;Slagter et al 2020;Yirsaw et al 2017), amongst others. In the above-mentioned studies, several techniques such as maximum likelihood, support vector machine, artificial neural network, CART, random forest, object-based image analysis and decision tree were applied to assess wetland changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies apply remote sensing methodologies to quantify the scale and magnitude of natural areas lost in the growth path of major cities. Some of these have documented the reduction of wetlands (Ahmed et al 2019;Basu et al 2021;Kiran & Joshi 2013;Goswami et al 2020), deforestation and forest degradation (Remondi et al 2016;Ahrends et al 2010), decrease in vegetation cover (Abass et al 2020;Hou et al 2016;Yao et al 2019) and increasing fragmentation of natural areas (Kowe et al 2021;Girma et al 2019;Wang & Pei 2020). However, these studies offer limited insights into the drivers and dynamics of urban development in ecologically sensitive areas, why such sites are not sufficiently protected from encroachment and how more sustainable trajectories of expansion may be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%