2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an instrument to measure a facet of quality teaching: Culturally responsive pedagogy

Abstract: This paper presents findings of Phase 2 of a larger three phase study examining culturally responsive pedagogies and their influence on Indigenous student outcomes. Characteristics of culturally responsive pedagogies obtained through interviews with Australian Indigenous¹ parents and students generated characteristics and themes which were distilled into survey items. The resulting instrument was applied to practicing teachers for validation. The survey was piloted on a sample of 141 elementary and secondary t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CRT in technology-supported learning environments 2447 (Gay, 2002) and provide an accessible process through which students and community can be included (Boon & Lewthwaite, 2015). Huang and Liu (2017) further emphasised the importance of using both local standard and cultural responses as a basis for designing curricula.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CRT in technology-supported learning environments 2447 (Gay, 2002) and provide an accessible process through which students and community can be included (Boon & Lewthwaite, 2015). Huang and Liu (2017) further emphasised the importance of using both local standard and cultural responses as a basis for designing curricula.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have suggested that a well‐structured CRT curriculum can facilitate a teacher's understanding of the ways in which cultural backgrounds and experiences can be used to enhance students' learning achievements (Chou, Su, & Wang, 2018; Gunn & King, 2015; Whitaker & Valtierra, 2018). Several studies have used the CRT framework to examine in‐service teacher perceptions of CRT (eg, Bersh, 2018; Boon & Lewthwaite, 2015; Jabbar & Hardaker, 2013; Santoro & Kennedy, 2016; Savva, 2017; Wyatt, 2014); per‐service teacher practices in CRT (eg, Bottoms, Ciechanowski, Jones, Hoz, & Fonseca, 2017; Chou, Su, & Wang, 2018; Chuang, 2016; Warren, 2018); and efforts to use a CRT approach in specific domains, such as science (Brown & Crippen, 2017), reading comprehension (Bui & Fagan, 2013), and math (Bottoms et al , 2017). Boon and Lewthwaite (2015) developed a culturally responsive pedagogy (CRP) questionnaire for Australian teachers that addressed gaps in teachers' understanding of quality education from the perspective of multicultural learners and their communities.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to help teachers to improve their pedagogy for students from diverse backgrounds we focused on instruction processes and classroom dispositions that Australian Indigenous students and their parents endorsed as being helpful for their learning. To that end we followed a two phase research protocol reported fully in Boon and Lewthwaite (2015), as a precursor to a third forthcoming intervention phase. We conducted interviews with 27 Indigenous parents, 43 grade 9-12 students and also with Indigenous teachers and a teacher administrator responsible for curriculum delivery and appropriate pedagogical practice for Indigenous students and gathered information about the specific classroom behaviours that typified quality teaching for Indigenous students.…”
Section: Aims and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample upon which we tested the instrument consisted of 80 elementary and 61 secondary school teachers. For extensive statistical details of the piloting phase using Rasch analyses to validate the instrument please refer to Boon and Lewthwaite, (2015). The validation process of the instrument resulted in 62 well-fitting items (Table 2).…”
Section: Instrumentation Process and The Use Of The Rasch Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From globalization to multiculturalism, it is recognized that classroom interculturalism requires greater awareness of the cultural contexts, on behalf of international visiting students and faculty, that may clash with domestic students’ cultures (9); however, less direct work specifically addresses this through faculty development. A developed instrument to measure culturally responsive pedagogy helps by providing questions for faculty to consider for diverse students in home classrooms as well as for intercultural education (10). While the focus here is on CHC, we see common pitfalls globally in attempts to reform educational systems with social constructivism and student-centered learning when teacher-centered modes are the norm and the roles that cultural, economic, and political forces play have not been considered (11).…”
Section: Challenges In Culturally Appropriate Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%