2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an individualized risk calculator for poor functioning in young people victimized during childhood: A longitudinal cohort study

Abstract: BackgroundChildhood victimization elevates the average risk of developing functional impairment in adulthood. However, not all victimized children demonstrate poor outcomes. Although research has described factors that confer vulnerability or resilience, it is unknown if this knowledge can be translated to accurately identify the most vulnerable victimized children.ObjectiveTo build and internally validate a risk calculator to identify those victimized children who are most at risk of functional impairment at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, adulthood anxiety in victims of early trauma has been reported to vary depending on the person’s resilience ( 59 61 ). Those with low resilience become sensitized to emotional difficulties by childhood adversity, whereas others may even achieve posttraumatic growth after similar experiences ( 62 , 63 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, adulthood anxiety in victims of early trauma has been reported to vary depending on the person’s resilience ( 59 61 ). Those with low resilience become sensitized to emotional difficulties by childhood adversity, whereas others may even achieve posttraumatic growth after similar experiences ( 62 , 63 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NEET status, parenthood, and cautions and convictions were naturally dichotomous; all other variables were dichotomised. For variables with no predetermined cut-off (social isolation, low life satisfaction, loneliness, and low sleep quality) we defined poor functioning as being among the 20% worst scoring participants for an outcome (as previously used in this cohort [30,31]).…”
Section: Age-18 Functional Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we created two age-18 outcome variables capturing whether individuals had any: (i) psychosocial disadvantage (1 = yes; 0 = no), or (ii) vocational disadvantage (1 = yes; 0 = no). These functioning factors have been used previously in this cohort to minimise multiple testing [30].…”
Section: Age-18 Functional Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, these findings are of limited practical use to health and social care practitioners who assess individual children and therefore seek insight into that particular child's level of future vulnerability or resilience. Our recent work to translate this current knowledge into a risk calculator screening tool that makes individual-level predictions is therefore notable (Latham et al, 2019;Meehan et al, 2020). Although this tool needs to be validated in external samples before being implemented, our initial evidence demonstrates its potential to support practitioners to accurately identify which victimised children are at high risk of developing poor outcomes at the transition to adulthood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%