2013
DOI: 10.1097/00001416-201310000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an Expert Clinical Instructor: A Theoretical Model for Clinical Teaching in Physical Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students expected the relationship to be reciprocal, relaxed and open, so that they would feel comfortable asking questions. These findings resonate with findings in previous studies (Buccieri, Pivko & Olzenak 2013 ; Oyeyemi et al 2012 ). If these expectations were not addressed, the T-L relationship was affected negatively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Students expected the relationship to be reciprocal, relaxed and open, so that they would feel comfortable asking questions. These findings resonate with findings in previous studies (Buccieri, Pivko & Olzenak 2013 ; Oyeyemi et al 2012 ). If these expectations were not addressed, the T-L relationship was affected negatively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The experience creation scale captures CIs’ ability to create LExps across a variety of student learning styles and abilities. In prior studies, students reported that CIs who take the time to get to know the student’s preferred learning style, respond to the student’s individual learning needs, engage the student as an adult learner, and use multiple types of instructional strategies create an effective LExp [ 4 , 12 , 13 ]. Additionally, the PT literature has identified essential CI characteristics as including goal setting and goal writing, as well as teaching and learning styles [ 2 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Housel and Gandy [ 2 ] used demographic data and 27 items pertaining to CI-specific criteria of the NEC-ACCE (New England Consortium of Academic Coordinators of Clinical Education) ‘Student’s evaluation of CE experience.’ The tool was reviewed for face and content validity only and not for use with CIs. Buccieri et al [ 4 ] used a qualitative grounded theory approach via semi-structured interviews to find meaning in CIs’ descriptions of clinical teaching. To date, a valid and reliable instrument to measure CTE from the CI’s perspective is lacking in PT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5]8,[16][17][18][19] This literature highlights the central importance of the CI in creating a quality clinical education experience and identifies broad categories of critical CI capabilities that include interpersonal, teaching, and evaluation skills. 3,4,8,16,17 Within these categories, evidence demonstrates the importance of CI characteristics such as confidence, adaptability in teaching style, ability to facilitate clinical reasoning and critical reflection, and competence in providing effective formative and summative feedback. 3,4,8,16,17 Existing literature also describes the pathways or processes CIs follow to gain proficiency as a clinical teacher.…”
Section: Current Status: Defining and Assessing Excellence In Clinical Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%