“…The detailed analysis of the increment of C L max and stall angle is presented in the following table: From the Table-1, it is clear that for NACA 0021 aerofoil the computational gain is higher than the experimental gain for all the velocity ratios, except for case of the zero velocity ratio. Noteworthy, the numerical study does not include the effect of fluid-structure interaction (FSI) [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Thereby, the associated vibration is neglected in the numerical results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This preliminary study indicates the feasibility of practical implementation of leading edge cylinders for thick aerofoil in aviation, wind turbine, and other applications. The use of the above-mentioned modifications to the aerofoil would add further layer of complexity for the structural health monitoring (SHM) system due to the addition of cylinder-driven vibrations [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
A number of experimental and numerical studies point out that incorporating a rotating cylinder can superiorly enhance the aerofoil performance, especially for higher velocity ratios. Yet, there have been less or no studies exploring the effects of lower velocity ratio at a higher Reynolds number. In the present study, we investigated the effects of Moving Surface Boundary-layer Control (MSBC) at lower velocity ratios (i.e. cylinder tangential velocity to free stream velocity) and higher Reynolds number on a symmetric aerofoil (e.g. NACA 0021) and an asymmetric aerofoil (e.g. NACA 23018). In particular, the aerodynamic performance with and without rotating cylinder at the leading edge of the NACA 0021 and NACA 23018 aerofoil was studied on the wind tunnel installed at Aerodynamics Laboratory. The aerofoil section was tested in the low subsonic wind tunnel, and the lift coefficient and the drag coefficient were studied for different angles of attack. The experiments were conducted for two Reynolds numbers: 200000 and 250000 corresponding to two free stream velocities: 20 m/s and 25 m/s, respectively, for six different angle of attacks (-5°, 0°, 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°). This study demonstrates that the incorporation of a leading edge rotating cylinder results in an increase of lift coefficient at lower angle of attacks (maximum around 33%) and delay in stall angle (from 10° to 15°) relative to the aerofoil without rotating cylinder.
“…The detailed analysis of the increment of C L max and stall angle is presented in the following table: From the Table-1, it is clear that for NACA 0021 aerofoil the computational gain is higher than the experimental gain for all the velocity ratios, except for case of the zero velocity ratio. Noteworthy, the numerical study does not include the effect of fluid-structure interaction (FSI) [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Thereby, the associated vibration is neglected in the numerical results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This preliminary study indicates the feasibility of practical implementation of leading edge cylinders for thick aerofoil in aviation, wind turbine, and other applications. The use of the above-mentioned modifications to the aerofoil would add further layer of complexity for the structural health monitoring (SHM) system due to the addition of cylinder-driven vibrations [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
A number of experimental and numerical studies point out that incorporating a rotating cylinder can superiorly enhance the aerofoil performance, especially for higher velocity ratios. Yet, there have been less or no studies exploring the effects of lower velocity ratio at a higher Reynolds number. In the present study, we investigated the effects of Moving Surface Boundary-layer Control (MSBC) at lower velocity ratios (i.e. cylinder tangential velocity to free stream velocity) and higher Reynolds number on a symmetric aerofoil (e.g. NACA 0021) and an asymmetric aerofoil (e.g. NACA 23018). In particular, the aerodynamic performance with and without rotating cylinder at the leading edge of the NACA 0021 and NACA 23018 aerofoil was studied on the wind tunnel installed at Aerodynamics Laboratory. The aerofoil section was tested in the low subsonic wind tunnel, and the lift coefficient and the drag coefficient were studied for different angles of attack. The experiments were conducted for two Reynolds numbers: 200000 and 250000 corresponding to two free stream velocities: 20 m/s and 25 m/s, respectively, for six different angle of attacks (-5°, 0°, 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°). This study demonstrates that the incorporation of a leading edge rotating cylinder results in an increase of lift coefficient at lower angle of attacks (maximum around 33%) and delay in stall angle (from 10° to 15°) relative to the aerofoil without rotating cylinder.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.