Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care

Abstract

Background Geriatric rehabilitation care (GRC) is short-term and multidisciplinary rehabilitation care for older vulnerable clients. Studies were conducted about its effects. However, elements that influence the quality of GRC have not been studied previously. Methods In this study realist evaluation is used to find out which are the mechanisms and outcomes and which (groups of) persons are the context for GRC, according to GRC professionals. The mechanisms, outcomes and context of GRC were explored in three consecutive phases of qualitative data gathering, i.e. individual interviews, expert meeting, and focus groups. Results Eight mechanisms — client centeredness, client satisfaction during rehabilitation, therapeutic climate, information provision to client and informal care givers, consultation about the rehabilitation (process), cooperation within the MultiDisciplinary Team (MDT), professionalism of GRC professionals, and organizational aspects — were found. Four context groups—the client, his family and/or informal care giver(s), the individual GRC professional, and the MDT—were mentioned by the respondents. Last, two outcome factors were determined, i.e. client satisfaction at discharge and rehabilitation goals accomplished. Conclusions In order to translate these insights into a practical tool that can be used by MDTs in the practice of GRC, identified mechanisms, contexts, and outcomes were visualized in a GRC evaluation tool. A graphic designer developed an interactive PDF which is the GRC evaluation tool. This tool may enable MDTs to discuss, prioritize, evaluate, and improve the quality of their GRC practice. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1213-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Lessons Learned From Co-Designing Educational Programs for Student and Practicing Healthcare Professionals in Nursing Homes: A Participatory Qualitative Study

“…The second case was based on an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care (Janssen et al, 2019). This tool offers multidisciplinary NH care teams insight into the quality of their geriatric rehabilitation care and areas for improvement.…”

The Role of Nursing Staff Regarding Goal Setting and Achieving in Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Focus Group Study

“…They found that patient goal engagement improved significantly between admission and discharge. In addition, the evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation, developed by Janssen et al (2019), confirms the appropriateness of working with small goals. Two of the evaluation tools’ criteria are “Rehabilitation goals are continuously coordinated with the client” and “Informal caregivers are explicitly involved in the therapy and are aware that they can practice with the client.”…”

The Economic Cost of the Loneliness of Older Persons

“…Moreover, scientific knowledge is often not immediately applicable into care practice. Therefore, we started and will continue to translate our knowledge in co-creation with older persons, care professionals and researchers into practical tools and working methods that can be implemented in care practice (Haufe et al, 2019;Janssen et al, 2019).…”