2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.07.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an ELISA microarray platform for the sensitive and quantitative detection of botulinum neurotoxins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the conventional ELISA test is less sensitive than the MBA and cross-reactivity between serotypes can be problematic (Wilder-Kofie et al, 2011). Even a more recently described high-affinity monoclonal antibody capture ELISA was seven times less sensitive than the modified FDC assay (Zhang et al, 2012) while a BoTest immunoprecipitation method was no more sensitive (LoD 0.1 pM,~3 LD 50 per ml serum) than the MBA (Dunning et al, 2012). Additionally, sensitive (LoD 0.01 LD 50 ml -1 ) direct endopeptidase tests (Jones et al, 2008) are adversely affected when partially or undiluted serum is used (R. G. A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the conventional ELISA test is less sensitive than the MBA and cross-reactivity between serotypes can be problematic (Wilder-Kofie et al, 2011). Even a more recently described high-affinity monoclonal antibody capture ELISA was seven times less sensitive than the modified FDC assay (Zhang et al, 2012) while a BoTest immunoprecipitation method was no more sensitive (LoD 0.1 pM,~3 LD 50 per ml serum) than the MBA (Dunning et al, 2012). Additionally, sensitive (LoD 0.01 LD 50 ml -1 ) direct endopeptidase tests (Jones et al, 2008) are adversely affected when partially or undiluted serum is used (R. G. A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%