1997
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0029299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an automatic surgical holding system based on ergonomic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also some other researches, for example, the programmed breaking [44] like two systems named IMCAS and P-TER based on different technologies have been discussed in Erbse et al [ 45 ] and Davis and Book [ 46 ] respectively in early stages. And the localization of force sensors to measure and predict the surgeon's motivation [47] which determine the accuracy of the comanipulation system is conducted.…”
Section: E Other Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also some other researches, for example, the programmed breaking [44] like two systems named IMCAS and P-TER based on different technologies have been discussed in Erbse et al [ 45 ] and Davis and Book [ 46 ] respectively in early stages. And the localization of force sensors to measure and predict the surgeon's motivation [47] which determine the accuracy of the comanipulation system is conducted.…”
Section: E Other Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the combination of different senses such as vision and haptics (kinesthesis or proprioception) improves performance of human movements and coordination in general tasks [31,32]. Different technologies have been used to generate haptic feedback on different types of constraints [28,[33][34][35]. Ho et al [36], Harris [37], and Kazerooni and Jenhwa [38] emphasize the cooperative manipulation of the tool by the surgeon moving the endeffector of a robot with programmable constraints.…”
Section: Teleoperated Synergistic System Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…generell verfügbarer Komponenten und Technologien sowie aus der Nutzung relativ einfacher Unterstützungs-systeme [27,28,29]. Nach einer Studie von Leape et al [30], in der die Ursachen für Fehler und Komplikationen bei der Nutzung technischer Systeme in der Medizin untersucht wurden, arbeiteten diese in 77,2 % der identifizierten Fälle gemäß ihren technischen Spezifikationen, jedoch hatten die Nutzer Probleme mit der korAbb.…”
Section: Smart Integrationunclassified