2018
DOI: 10.2991/j.jegh.2018.10.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an Arabic Version of the Hiroshima University-Dental Behavioral Inventory: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity

Abstract: KeywordsArabic oral health attitudes/behaviour reliability validity A B S T R A C TThe Hiroshima University-Dental Behavioral Inventory (HU-DBI) has not been adequately translated to the Arabic language. The aim of this study is the translation and cultural adaption of the English HU-DBI into standard Arabic. The English HU-DBI was translated into Arabic by three bilingual dental academics. A nonmedical professional performed backward translation into English. The three bilinguals compared both English version… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hiroshima University-Dental Behavioural Inventory (HU-DBI) was established by Kawamura to examine dental health behaviour, perceptions and attitudes. It has already been translated from Japanese into German and multiple other languages for cross-cultural comparisons [17,20,21]. Results of these translated versions, including the German translation, have been reported previously and exhibited good validity and reliability [20].…”
Section: Study Population and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The Hiroshima University-Dental Behavioural Inventory (HU-DBI) was established by Kawamura to examine dental health behaviour, perceptions and attitudes. It has already been translated from Japanese into German and multiple other languages for cross-cultural comparisons [17,20,21]. Results of these translated versions, including the German translation, have been reported previously and exhibited good validity and reliability [20].…”
Section: Study Population and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A bi-lingual SAQ was used to collect data digitally from the participating students through KoBoToolbox (Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA, USA) [54]. The Arabic version of HU-DBI developed and validated by Daou et al 2018 was used in addition to the English and French versions [55,56]. All original items of HU-DBI are binary questions, with "Agree" or "Disagree" answers, out of which 12 items are used to compute the overall HU-DBI score.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%