1996
DOI: 10.1006/csla.1996.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an approach to automatic language identification based on phone recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10] successfully used phonotactic-acoustic features. Later Yan [9] applied a comb ination of acoustic, phonotactic and prosodic information for language identification. Nagawaka [8] co mpared four different methods to identify languages and concluded that continuous hidden Markov model (HMM) based method works best.…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] successfully used phonotactic-acoustic features. Later Yan [9] applied a comb ination of acoustic, phonotactic and prosodic information for language identification. Nagawaka [8] co mpared four different methods to identify languages and concluded that continuous hidden Markov model (HMM) based method works best.…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an English phone recognizer. Zissman [51] and Yan [48] Mendoza [30], Schultz [43,44] and Hieronymus [16] have have extended this work to systems containing multiple,…”
Section: Language Identification Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the statistical sense, phonotactics can be viewed as a subset of grammatical and lexical rules of a language, whose discriminancy is naturally reflected in the phonotactic properties. Several contributions were published dealing with the use of phone -grams, particularly bigrams, for phonotactic classification of languages [3]- [6] showing superior performance as compared to purely acoustic or prosodic systems. Various configurations of multiple language-dependent phone-recognizers, run in parallel, were designed to represent different phone repertories of the languages and to improve the performance of simple phonotactic components [3], [4].…”
Section: Language Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%