2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an adverse outcome pathway for cranio-facial malformations: A contribution from in silico simulations and in vitro data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In WEC, VPA exposure (from 750 to 1500 M, comparable to the concentrations used in our present work) resulted in brain and branchial defects, irregular dorsal midline, and changes in transcriptomics [36][37][38]. Recently, our research group reported dose-related teratogenic effects of VPA (from 31.25 to 375 M) in a WEC model with branchial and extra-branchial (neural tube and axial) defects [39]. However, WEC test does not provide any information on behaviour and/or neurological deficits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In WEC, VPA exposure (from 750 to 1500 M, comparable to the concentrations used in our present work) resulted in brain and branchial defects, irregular dorsal midline, and changes in transcriptomics [36][37][38]. Recently, our research group reported dose-related teratogenic effects of VPA (from 31.25 to 375 M) in a WEC model with branchial and extra-branchial (neural tube and axial) defects [39]. However, WEC test does not provide any information on behaviour and/or neurological deficits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In the present work results obtained using amphibian model (R-FETAX) were compared with those obtained in the mammalian model (WEC) used in the past to evaluate teratogenic activity of different substances including VPA [39]. The effects of R-FETAX and WEC on the brain were similar (dilated ventricles), and the relative sensitivities of the two methods (as evaluated by PROAST) were comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations