2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an active elbow flexion simulator to evaluate joint kinematics with the humerus in the horizontal position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21e23 Simulated muscle activation using this simulator has been shown to resist the gravity moment during active motion compared to passive motion. 17 However in this study, simulated muscle activation was unable to overcome the large moment on the elbow due to gravity in the varus and valgus orientations, resulting in elbow subluxation, dislocation, and coronoid fractures. This was certainly due to the instability caused by the induced collateral ligament injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…21e23 Simulated muscle activation using this simulator has been shown to resist the gravity moment during active motion compared to passive motion. 17 However in this study, simulated muscle activation was unable to overcome the large moment on the elbow due to gravity in the varus and valgus orientations, resulting in elbow subluxation, dislocation, and coronoid fractures. This was certainly due to the instability caused by the induced collateral ligament injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Those loads were used to ensure that the closed-loop load feedback controller did not allow slack within the tendons during motion. 29,30 This flexion-extension test was repeated for each finger (index, middle, and ring) in each wrist position (neutral, 30 flexed, and 30 extended). After all intact active finger motion simulations, a longitudinal incision was made along the length of the volar surface of the digit 1 cm proximal to the MCP joint and 1 cm distal to the DIP joint to identify the pulleys.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in vitro study used 8 fresh, previously frozen cadaveric arms (60.9 AE 18.2 years, 8 men) and a previously described elbow motion simulator. 11 A computed tomography (CT) scan (GE Lightspeed VCT 64 slice CT scanner; General Electric, New Berlin, WI) of each arm was performed to screen for deformity, previous trauma, or arthritis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%