2022
DOI: 10.1002/mp.15701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an abdominal phantom for the validation of an oligometastatic disease diagnosis workflow

Abstract: Purpose The liver is a common site for metastatic disease, which is a challenging and life‐threatening condition with a grim prognosis and outcome. We propose a standardized workflow for the diagnosis of oligometastatic disease (OMD), as a gold standard workflow has not been established yet. The envisioned workflow comprises the acquisition of a multimodal image data set, novel image processing techniques, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)‐guided biopsy for subsequent molecular subtyping. By combining m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 . The system was placed on the table of a CT scanner together with an abdominal phantom including liver lesions, further described in [ 15 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 . The system was placed on the table of a CT scanner together with an abdominal phantom including liver lesions, further described in [ 15 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both qualitative and quantitative MRI phantoms are useful for developing or updating body MRI protocols, because they provide a consistent and reproducible environment for testing and optimizing imaging parameters. For example, a recent study used an abdominal phantom to design a standardized workflow and multimodal imaging pipeline to detect liver lesions [70].…”
Section: Development Of Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personalized image-guided therapies that consider tumor heterogeneity have shown potential in improving survival rates [9,10]. Typically, CT imaging is used for these interventions, while MRI is utilized to characterize tumor heterogeneity, which is often invisible in CT scans [11]. Differences in patient positioning in the two scanners, as well as the patient's respiration, result in the organs being deformed differently in the corresponding CT and MR images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%