Development of Alive! (A Lifestyle Intervention Via Email), and Its Effect on Health-related Quality of Life, Presenteeism, and Other Behavioral Outcomes: Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background Cost-effective interventions to improve diet and physical activity are a public health priority. Alive! is an email-based intervention to increase physical activity, reduce saturated and trans fats and added sugars, and increase fruit and vegetable consumption. It was shown to improve these behaviors in a large randomized controlled trial.Objective (1) To describe the components and behavioral principles underlying Alive!, and (2) to report effects of the intervention on the secondary outcomes: health-related quality of life, presenteeism, self-efficacy, and stage of change.Methods The Alive! behavior change model is designed to elicit healthy behaviors and promote their maintenance. Behavioral strategies include assessments followed by individualized feedback, weekly goal-setting, individually tailored goals and tips, reminders, and promotion of social support. Alive! was tested among non-medical employees of Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, who were randomized to either the intervention group or the wait-list control group. After randomization, intervention group participants chose one topic to undertake for the intervention period: increasing physical activity, increasing fruits and vegetables, or decreasing saturated and trans fats and added sugars. Pre-post questionnaires assessed changes in SF-8 health-related quality of life, presenteeism, self-efficacy, and stage of change. Mixed effects multiple linear regression and ordinal logistic regression models were used, with department as a random effect factor. Analyses were by intention to treat: the 30% (238/787) who did not respond to the follow-up questionnaires were assigned change scores of zero.ResultsParticipants were 19 to 65 years (mean 44.0 +/- 10.6), and 74.3% (585/787) were female. Mean SF-8 Physical quality of life score increased significantly more in the intervention group than in the control group, 1.84 (95% CI 0.96-2.72) vs 0.72 (95% CI -0.15-1.58) respectively, P = .02. SF8 Mental score also improved significantly more in the intervention group than in the control group (P = .02). The odds ratio for improvement in self-assessed health status was 1.57 (95% CI 1.21-2.04, P < .001) for the intervention group compared to the control group. The odds ratio for having a reduction in difficulty accomplishing work tasks because of physical or emotional problems, a measure of presenteeism, was 1.47 (95% CI 1.05-2.05, P = .02) for the intervention group compared to the control group. The odds of having an improvement in self-efficacy for changing diet was 2.05 (95% CI 1.44-2.93) for the intervention vs the control group (P < .001). Greater improvement in stage of change for physical activity (P = .05), fats (P = .06), and fruits/vegetables (P = .006) was seen in the intervention group compared to the control group. Significant effects on diet and physical activity behavior change are reported elsewhere.Conclusions Cost-effective methods that can reach large populations with science-based interventions are urgently needed. Alive! is a...

The potential role of fruit and vegetables in aspects of psychological well-being: a review of the literature and future directions

“…Similar heterogeneous findings for the effect of a vegetarian dietary intervention on depression, anxiety, stress and general mood have been found based on discordant results per subscale of the psychological measurement tool used (99) . Other studies have been more varied in their approach, in that the interventions have targeted other lifestyle behaviours as well as FV intake, such as physical activity (100)(101)(102)(103)(104) . Findings are again inconsistent.…”

Feasibility of a Fully Automated Multiple Session Alcohol Intervention to University Students, Using Different Modes of Electronic Delivery—The TOPHAT 1 Study

“…Using simple proactive messages, delivered via SMS or email, has been used successfully in trials where consideration has been taken to smoking habits [17], physical activity [18] and weight loss [19]. Although slightly different in their nature, the main component of the interventions has been messages delivered continuously during a set time period.…”

Self-regulation and physical activity in WKU employees

“…Scores on the goal setting measure were below the midline for preparation and increased towards the midline in action and maintenance stages (See Figure 2), suggesting that individuals in higher stages of change more effectively use goal setting to progress to and maintain a higher stage of change. An intervention tailoring physical activity goals to individuals found similar results, in which individuals in the intervention group had a greater change towards a higher stage compared to the control group (Gladys et al, 2008). A study using the same goal setting measure (Exercise Goal-Setting Scale) found that increased goal setting behaviors successfully predicted increased PA behavior (Rovniak, Anderson, Winett, & Stephens, 2002).…”

“…After six months of regular PA, a person has achieved the target behavior, and is in the maintenance stage. Research has shown differences in constructs such as SDT (Daley & Duda, 2006), self-efficacy for exercise , and goal setting (Gladys et al, 2008) across stages of change. It is hypothesized that individuals within a higher stage of change will have more adaptive scores across all constructs within the ESRM.…”