2019
DOI: 10.4102/abc.v49i1.2361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of alien and invasive taxa lists for regulation of biological invasions in South Africa

Abstract: Background: Lists are fundamental for guiding policy and management of biological invasions. The process of developing regulatory lists of alien and invasive taxa should be based on scientific evidence through an objective, transparent and consistent process.Objectives: In this study, we review the development of the lists for the alien and invasive species regulations in terms of section 97(1) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (NEM:BA) (Act No. 10 of 2004).Method: Lists publishe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(93 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the US economy loses up to an average of 7.7 billion dollars of income to invasive plant species annually (Pimentel et al, 2005), likewise in South Africa it has been estimated that the control of AIS between 1997 and 2016 costs the country US$ 27 million (van Wilgen, Fill, Govender, & Foxcroft, 2017). These costs are likely to increase over the course of time due to increasing trade and other economic activities between countries, as well as the import and export of animal and plant species for various activities such as the pet trade, horticulture and sport hunting, within the country (Moshobane, Mukundamago, Adu‐Acheampong, & Shackleton, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the US economy loses up to an average of 7.7 billion dollars of income to invasive plant species annually (Pimentel et al, 2005), likewise in South Africa it has been estimated that the control of AIS between 1997 and 2016 costs the country US$ 27 million (van Wilgen, Fill, Govender, & Foxcroft, 2017). These costs are likely to increase over the course of time due to increasing trade and other economic activities between countries, as well as the import and export of animal and plant species for various activities such as the pet trade, horticulture and sport hunting, within the country (Moshobane, Mukundamago, Adu‐Acheampong, & Shackleton, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps citizen science would help to generate the distributional and ecological data of alien species on a national scale (Anderson et al, 2017). This information is essential for the management of invasive species, in order strategically to allocate surveillance and control efforts that are aimed at limiting the spread and impact of this land-invasive species (Moshobane et al, 2019).…”
Section: Distribution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, impacts associated with biological invasions have led to the development of impact assessment tools intending to quantify the impacts posed by alien invasive species (Nentwig et al 2016;Rumlerová et al 2016;Bartz and Kowarik 2019). The impact assessment tools are based on scientific evidence (Kumschick et al 2015;Moshobane et al 2019), comparable across different regions and taxa ) and allow for the synthesis of impact data (Vilà et al 2019). Several tools have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the global biodiversity goals, most countries worldwide are committed to preventing the introduction of high-priority species or minimising their impacts (Moshobane et al 2019;Verbrugge et al 2019). The Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA, now Department of Environment, Forestry & Fisheries, DEFF), through the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), aims to eventually conduct an impact assessment for all listed species as invasive under the National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act (NEMBA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%