2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-017-0025-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of algae removal method based on positively charged bubbles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is widely used in drinking water treatment. However, because the surfaces of microbubbles (MBs) are negatively charged, problems such as poor adhesion of MBs to particles with negative charges on the surface and a small sweeping volume of MBs often exist in conventional DAF (Kim, Park, & Han, 2017). Because positive modification DAF (Posi‐DAF) can overcome the above problems, it has shown good application prospects in removing algae cells in drinking water in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is widely used in drinking water treatment. However, because the surfaces of microbubbles (MBs) are negatively charged, problems such as poor adhesion of MBs to particles with negative charges on the surface and a small sweeping volume of MBs often exist in conventional DAF (Kim, Park, & Han, 2017). Because positive modification DAF (Posi‐DAF) can overcome the above problems, it has shown good application prospects in removing algae cells in drinking water in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the removal of microalgae using the dissolved air flotation method has been reported by previous studies through the control of zeta potential, successful flotation relies on the efficiency of particle-bubble attachment (Henderson et al 2008;Kim et al 2017). The range of zeta potential between -8 and +2 mV provides optimum removal efficiency with respect to the combination of coagulant dose and pH adjustment for flotation (Henderson et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, in order to enhance the collision efficiency between microalgal particles and bubbles, those values should be of opposite charges. Thus, low removal efficiency can be yielded when both bubbles and microalgal particles exhibit similar charges (Kim et al 2017). The addition of AFlok-BP1 caused a significant reduction of zeta potential value which enhanced the interaction between the bubbles and flocs.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Saturator Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations