Volume 1: Aircraft Engine; Marine; Turbomachinery; Microturbines and Small Turbomachinery 1999
DOI: 10.1115/99-gt-096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Advanced Compressor Airfoils for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines: Part II — Experimental and Theoretical Analysis

Abstract: In Part I of this paper a family of numerically optimized subsonic compressor airfoils for heavy-duty gas turbines, covering a wide range of flow properties, is presented. The objective of the optimization was 10 create profiles with a wide low loss incidence range. Therefore, design point and off-design performance had to be considered in an objective function. The special flow conditions in large scale gas turbines have been taken into account by performing the numerical optimization procedure at high Reynol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrary, it is better to have a strong acceleration and deceleration close to the leading edge where the turbulent boundary layer is thin and to reduce the deceleration towards the trailing edge where the boundary layer is thicker. Airfoil shapes which are similar to the obtained designs were investigated numerically and experimentally by and Küsters et al (2000). The profiles were also highly front-loaded and showed an early transition.…”
Section: Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In contrary, it is better to have a strong acceleration and deceleration close to the leading edge where the turbulent boundary layer is thin and to reduce the deceleration towards the trailing edge where the boundary layer is thicker. Airfoil shapes which are similar to the obtained designs were investigated numerically and experimentally by and Küsters et al (2000). The profiles were also highly front-loaded and showed an early transition.…”
Section: Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…On the right hand side, the loss-incidence characteristics show The profile section isentropic Mach number distribution is shown in Figure 7, left. It can be seen that the DLR airfoil shows a more frontloaded design, often seen in new airfoil development projects, such as Siemens HPA-Airfoils (see Köller et al [25] and Küsters et al [26]). It is still subsonic in OP0.…”
Section: Airfoil Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pierret, 1999 used an artificial neural network coupled with a Navier-Stokes solver to maximize the efficiency and/or operating range of two-dimensional compressor cascades and then staggered them in radial direction to obtain the three dimensional blade. Köller et al, 2000 andKüsters et al, 2000 developed a new family of compressor airfoils, characterized by low total pressure losses and larger operating range with respect to standard Controlled Diffusion Airfoils (CDA), using a gradient optimization method and an inviscid/viscous code. Until today, the use of evolutionary techniques in combination with CFD codes for solving multi-objective optimization problems in compressor aerodynamics has been limited by the tremendous computational effort required.…”
Section: Direct Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%