2018 3rd Biennial South African Biomedical Engineering Conference (SAIBMEC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/saibmec.2018.8363196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a vital signs monitoring wireless ear probe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criterion weights can be applied after conducting experiments with given devices and expert evaluation in relation to indices of human physiological fatigue where measurement parameter sensitivity is statistically calculated in correlation with human reaction time, mental or physical performance scores or subjective evaluation scores, or other problem domain specific generally accepted measures. Note: D1 -Mindwave Mobile 2 [30]; D2 -Cosinuss One [31]; D3 -Polar H7 [32]; D4.Mindfielde Sense Skin Response [33]; D5 -Project AWAKE [34]; D6 -Xethru X4M200 [35]; D7 -Nexus 10 MK II [36]; Conclusions 1. A selection of physiological parameters based on multi-criterion evaluation of measurement sensors proposed in the current work shows the multi-sensor consumer device (D2) advantages over single electrical activity sensor devices (D1, D3, D4) in terms of parameter coverage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criterion weights can be applied after conducting experiments with given devices and expert evaluation in relation to indices of human physiological fatigue where measurement parameter sensitivity is statistically calculated in correlation with human reaction time, mental or physical performance scores or subjective evaluation scores, or other problem domain specific generally accepted measures. Note: D1 -Mindwave Mobile 2 [30]; D2 -Cosinuss One [31]; D3 -Polar H7 [32]; D4.Mindfielde Sense Skin Response [33]; D5 -Project AWAKE [34]; D6 -Xethru X4M200 [35]; D7 -Nexus 10 MK II [36]; Conclusions 1. A selection of physiological parameters based on multi-criterion evaluation of measurement sensors proposed in the current work shows the multi-sensor consumer device (D2) advantages over single electrical activity sensor devices (D1, D3, D4) in terms of parameter coverage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respirations are measured visually or by using a stethoscope or electro-cardiogram. At the research stage, there has been a method of estimating respiration from breathing sounds measured with a microphone attached to the chest [ 2 ], a method of estimating respiration from pulse sensor values [ 3 , 4 ], methods of measuring respiration from chest movements obtained using camera images [ 5 ] or laser range finders [ 6 ], a method of measuring respiration based on the electrical impedance in the arm [ 7 ], and methods of estimating respiration based on measurement values from flow sensors attached to the mouth [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. These are all beneficial research methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of point-of-care testing (POCT) was introduced, mainly in Western countries, in the 1980s; since the second half of the 1990s, we have seen the rapid spread of POCT measuring devices [ 13 ]. When considering respiratory rate measurement equipment suited for POCT, it is important not only that the measurements are accurate but, from the initial stages of basic design, that development proceed so that “equipment be lightweight, low-cost, simple to operate, and capable of rapidly starting respiration measurement.” Some of the respiratory measurement devices [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ] described above can be adapted for POCT, but were not originally studied and developed with the aim of being adapted for POCT. Aiming to develop a respiratory measurement device adapted for POCT, we have studied and developed an earphone-type respiratory measurement device (hereafter, referred to as an “earable POCER”).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of medical devices is essential in some critical clinical situations or when the patient is at home and needs remote diagnosis, these devices can be mobile [18,57,65] or installed close to the patient clinical bed [54]. The hardware/software of each device vary from others and depends on the manufacturer policy, these differences may generate some integration problems in the clinical situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%