2011
DOI: 10.1021/jp207181s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Transferable Variable Charge Potential for the Study of Energy Conversion Materials FeF2 and FeF3

Abstract: A variable charge potential is developed that is suitable for the simulations of energy conversion materials FeF2 and FeF3. Molecular dynamics simulations using this potential show that the calculated structural and elastic properties of both FeF2 and FeF3 are in good agreement with experimental data. Such a transferability of this potential rests in the fact that the difference in the bond characteristic between FeF2 and FeF3 is properly accounted for by the variable charge approach. The calculated equilibriu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the reconstructed structure (inset in Figure 7 ), the Fe–F bond distance is 1.98 and 1.88 Å, and the angle F–Fe–F and Fe–F–Fe is 82.1°. Compared with the FeF 2 crystal, the calculated Fe–F bond distance and F–Fe–F angle values prove to be in good agreement with the experimental value 30 of 2.05 ± 0.06 Å and 90°. Differently, the calculated F–Fe–F angle and Fe–F bond distance is lower than that of the FeF 2 compound, because no octahedra is presented in the reconstructed Fe surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In the reconstructed structure (inset in Figure 7 ), the Fe–F bond distance is 1.98 and 1.88 Å, and the angle F–Fe–F and Fe–F–Fe is 82.1°. Compared with the FeF 2 crystal, the calculated Fe–F bond distance and F–Fe–F angle values prove to be in good agreement with the experimental value 30 of 2.05 ± 0.06 Å and 90°. Differently, the calculated F–Fe–F angle and Fe–F bond distance is lower than that of the FeF 2 compound, because no octahedra is presented in the reconstructed Fe surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…While in theses examples we do not explicitly investigate the transferability of the potentials to different systems, we expect that the 4G-HDNNP in general provides an improved transferability compared to 2G and 3G ML potentials due to the underlying physical description of the global charge distribution and the resulting electrostatic energy. This expectation is supported by the fact that even traditional charge equilibration schemes with constant electronegativities are known to work well across different systems 44 . Furthermore, for the related CENT approach a broad transferability has already been demonstrated for different atomic environments 33 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, to better understand the voltage overpotential of the FeF 3 cathode, the charge-discharge reaction mechanism of FeF 3 has been investigated with X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray adsorption spectroscopy (XAS), ex-situ solid nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), TEM, and MD simulation. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The results of these investigations suggested the existence of an intermediate phase containing an Fe 2+ (such as FeF 2 ) during the charge process after the complete conversion reaction (FeF 3 + 3Li + ¼ 3LiF + Fe).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%