2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1041610209991736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a tool to evaluate geropsychology knowledge and skill competencies

Abstract: The evaluation tool has both strengths and limitations. We discuss future directions for its ongoing validation and professional use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, numerous resources exist to support evidence-based practices, help geropsychologists achieve and maintain competence in their clinical and forensic work with older adults, and promote ethical knowledge and decision making in geropsychology. Such resources include (a) position statements by professional organizations, particularly the APA (e.g., ABA & APA, 2005, 2008; APA, 2014); (b) scholarly works, such as ethics books, book chapters, and journal articles (e.g., Bush, 2009Bush, , 2012Bush, Allen, & Molinari, in press;Hays & Jennings, 2015;Karel, 2011); (c) the APA Ethics Code; (d) collegial consultation, broadly defined to include ethics committees, interdisciplinary colleagues, and other geropsychologists working with older adult patients; (e) the Fairhill guidelines on ethics of the care of people with Alzheimer's disease (Post & Whitehouse, 1995); (f) advance directives; and (g) the Pikes Peak documents (Karel et al, 2010;Knight et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, numerous resources exist to support evidence-based practices, help geropsychologists achieve and maintain competence in their clinical and forensic work with older adults, and promote ethical knowledge and decision making in geropsychology. Such resources include (a) position statements by professional organizations, particularly the APA (e.g., ABA & APA, 2005, 2008; APA, 2014); (b) scholarly works, such as ethics books, book chapters, and journal articles (e.g., Bush, 2009Bush, , 2012Bush, Allen, & Molinari, in press;Hays & Jennings, 2015;Karel, 2011); (c) the APA Ethics Code; (d) collegial consultation, broadly defined to include ethics committees, interdisciplinary colleagues, and other geropsychologists working with older adult patients; (e) the Fairhill guidelines on ethics of the care of people with Alzheimer's disease (Post & Whitehouse, 1995); (f) advance directives; and (g) the Pikes Peak documents (Karel et al, 2010;Knight et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, determining the appropriate level of involvement of trainees in capacity assessments or therapeutic interventions can be challenging in specific cases, given their varying levels of experience and knowledge. Within our training program, the use of a specified model of training which is linked to evaluation, such as the Pikes Peak training model (Knight, Karel, Hinrichsen, Qualls, & Duffy, 2009;Wharton, Shah, Scogin, & Allen, 2013) and the Pikes Peak Geropsychology Knowledge and Skill Assessment Tool (Karel et al, 2010), helps guide such training decisions with graduate students. The Pikes Peak training model and assessment tool covers the foundational and functional competencies expected of geropsychologists and provides a rating scale for clinician to rate their own competencies and those of trainees, helping to identify areas of strength and weakness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…nurses or psychologists; Karel et al, 2010), and on implementation of clinical interventions (e.g. Edvardsson et al, 2011), the KASA is tailored to the multidisciplinary and advisory role of DBMAS consultants.…”
Section: Strengths and Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%