Development of a thoracic personal sampler system for co-sampling of sulfuric acid mist and sulfur dioxide gas

Abstract

A novel personal sampler was designed to measure inorganic acid mists and gases for determining human exposure levels to these acids in workplaces. This sampler consists of (1) a parallel impactor for classifying aerosol by size following the ISO/CEN/ACGIH defined human thoracic fraction, (2) a cellulose filter to collect the residual acid mist but allowing penetration of sulfur dioxide gas, and (3) an accordion-shaped porous membrane denuder (aPMD) for adsorbing the penetrating sulfur dioxide gas. Acid-resistant PTFE was chosen as the housing material to minimize sampling interference. To test the performance of the parallel impactor, monodisperse aerosol was created by a vibrating orifice aerosol generator. The results showed that the penetration curve of the impactor run at 2 LPM flow rate agreed well with the defined thoracic fraction. Almost all sampling biases were within 10% for particle size distributions with MMAD between 1-25 µm and GSD between 1.75-4, which meets the criteria of the EN 13205 standard. To evaluate the performance of the aPMDs, sulfur dioxide gas was sourced directly from a cylinder. The aPMDs maintained a gas collection efficiency greater than 95% for 4 hr when sampling 8.6 ppm of sulfur dioxide gas. While the aPMD had similar performance to the commonly adopted annular or honeycomb denuders made of glass, this shatterproof aPMD is only half of the volume and 1/25 the weight of the honeycomb denuder. Testing of the entire sampler with a mixture of sulfuric acid mist and sulfur dioxide gas showed the system could sample both with negligible interference. All the test results illustrate that the new sampler, which is flat, lightweight, and portable, is suitable for personal use and is capable of a more accurate assessment of human exposure to inorganic acid mist and SO gas.

Laboratory comparison of new high flow rate respirable size-selective sampler

“…[13–15] The design of the test system was based on that described by Kenny and Lidén [16] used for the measurement of aerosol penetration through the GK4.162 cyclone. The approach required measurements of the particle size distribution of an aerosol penetrating through the GK 4.162 cyclone and that of the aerosol challenging it.…”

“…The estimated biases for each laboratory data were calculated using the bias map approach described in BS EN 13205 [13] and previous studies. [14,15] The lognormal distribution was assumed, and the calculation ranges of MMAD and GSD were 1–25 μm and 1.5–3.5, respectively.…”